X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=VRTP5lvcqbJU5zsUk4T8lwcXtmLBAZ9wdjMfLSN4xGRxYucgqE5II
	oHMHVTktD/Xh4O0aSJUAe+uAKBC1zo4jGj94fn9fpPeRl4ZfMKQ01sYJNXzoBEWX
	Cu/REgU90h7a26U78Z2PQN9Z6E4iIHVWPnQ99uplATY3e9pvNx9MK8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=AYqYMdcDoJCEeUp6DeSrPUddvWE=; b=kOcXxEHnQJp2OK9K1x/HdSrqm9wL
	lQCvjOg0MO6e1RwKvHJBJE+YQA0AC9/Gi/j9xmKMDXT0eT7dmNTdFtEjnidu6MGr
	PvfaUb38W4rQ96zwVN9blzIzWGz5I62TT1AWP+/wUT8SukSqMrUSL6MVZzr4PGRH
	xCX/CVG2q2zkKuA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:11:07 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Little cygpath improvement request
Message-ID: <20140216151107.GT2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <111910987 DOT 20140214222230 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FE6397 DOT 5010105 AT cygwin DOT com> <187072112 DOT 20140214234339 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20140215125606 DOT GM2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1745533059 DOT 20140215225708 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20140216120042 DOT GP2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <40596392 DOT 20140216184131 AT yandex DOT ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UkA0xnprSsTJHodh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40596392.20140216184131@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--UkA0xnprSsTJHodh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 16 18:41, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>=20
> >> >> >> I would like to request a small functional change for cygpath.
> >> >> >> In the event of empty given path argument (i.e. `cygpath -ml ""'=
) silently
> >> >> >> return an empty result without error message.
> >> >> >> This would greatly simplify wrapper scripts.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> > Why isn't redirecting the message to /dev/null not sufficient, so=
mething
> >> >> > like this (bash syntax)?
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Because it'll require creating a redirection? And this kind of redu=
ndant
> >> >> inserts blurring the code.
> >> >> Returning a non-zero exit code would suffice for debugging purposes.
> >> >>=20
> >> >> > cygpath -ml ""  >/dev/null 2&>1
> >> >>=20
> >> >> Err, not > /dev/null !!! :D
> >>=20
> >> >   dos_path=3D$( [ -n "${posix_path}" ] && cygpath -ml "${posix_path}=
" )
> >>=20
> >> > ?
> >>=20
> >> I appreciate the effort, bit this even MORE complicating the possible =
use
> >> case.
> >>=20
> >> Look, I'm asking for simplification without loosing functionality.
> >> If I NEED to check the path for existence, I would write something to =
the
> >> extent of
>=20
> > I'm getting a bit puzzled.  If it's only the message you don't want,
> > then why not just send this message to /dev/null???
>=20
> Because the message serves no purpose in every use case I could think abo=
ut.
> That, aside the fact it needs to create a redirection.
>=20
> >   NATIVE=3D$(cygpath -ml "$2" 2>/dev/null)

And what's the problem with redirections?

I fail to see the big difference between adding a redirection
compared to adding an option character.


Corinna


--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--UkA0xnprSsTJHodh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=U6O/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UkA0xnprSsTJHodh--