X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Mle8FUG1fuGxrBkqrX/2/j5o1lYozxTJdi/mvW/++fExaNqJ9NDcW
	YXYnHzh+7HtQtcJlQRlvCyW77ndt01wjd5Ro+9VNPQlv4IJXI0bsIaU7KheodE7J
	USZ3jNVBWpfWw4RJbmi5s+WFZfZuzK0Rou3XxT6BIltvGhofEcCnN0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=HYhj3BSHsEV0+c3CcpvkxSyuM98=; b=wpFfZWzRUNhaFTBoS4LAtFp4pq23
	nHtejbhPsv1X9tEHHXqjwgoHhh+WqLGXow2wIVa641JGDPHz1naheF5XhFybfphH
	ZOllkIDUosJjaGAwn54pxZEfrrt+C30Akv35Y5m3qZFLZ3BwO5hUl+9NnyAy9qil
	M6th39LpB2waD9U=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:00:42 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Little cygpath improvement request
Message-ID: <20140216120042.GP2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <111910987 DOT 20140214222230 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FE6397 DOT 5010105 AT cygwin DOT com> <187072112 DOT 20140214234339 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20140215125606 DOT GM2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1745533059 DOT 20140215225708 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4dlmIwqylWgRDx7z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1745533059.20140215225708@mtu-net.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--4dlmIwqylWgRDx7z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 15 22:57, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>=20
> >> >> I would like to request a small functional change for cygpath.
> >> >> In the event of empty given path argument (i.e. `cygpath -ml ""') s=
ilently
> >> >> return an empty result without error message.
> >> >> This would greatly simplify wrapper scripts.
> >>=20
> >> > Why isn't redirecting the message to /dev/null not sufficient, somet=
hing
> >> > like this (bash syntax)?
> >>=20
> >> Because it'll require creating a redirection? And this kind of redunda=
nt
> >> inserts blurring the code.
> >> Returning a non-zero exit code would suffice for debugging purposes.
> >>=20
> >> > cygpath -ml ""  >/dev/null 2&>1
> >>=20
> >> Err, not > /dev/null !!! :D
>=20
> >   dos_path=3D$( [ -n "${posix_path}" ] && cygpath -ml "${posix_path}" )
>=20
> > ?
>=20
> I appreciate the effort, bit this even MORE complicating the possible use
> case.
>=20
> Look, I'm asking for simplification without loosing functionality.
> If I NEED to check the path for existence, I would write something to the
> extent of

I'm getting a bit puzzled.  If it's only the message you don't want,
then why not just send this message to /dev/null???

  NATIVE=3D$(cygpath -ml "$2" 2>/dev/null)

> But if I (and the program that I would feed it to) don't care (which is o=
ften
> the case), the message printed from cygpath doesn't add to functionality.=
=20
>=20
> P.S.
> I've tried to rebuild it myself, but hit a roadblock.
> While trying to rebuild only winsup/utils, this happens

That never works.  Why don't you just fetch the source archive from
the last package and use the cygport file inside?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--4dlmIwqylWgRDx7z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=mZnz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4dlmIwqylWgRDx7z--