DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IecCamQhLBXP6l7d
	kSB3OGcaEd1p7oxZ1350udJC21QZKL3cyCt6b//OG2bxehl6mLYCL7ru3u+Nc2K+
	S+344oagal3yNODNU3Nds9Url0HtipKR0SfvHCmSn02OTm6oJ+LA2ErPhW+lOpcy
	TU+7XZS/1j8Yus3ur2ROX/UlgrU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <5300580C.2080901@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 01:17:48 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Little cygpath improvement request
References: <111910987 DOT 20140214222230 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FE6397 DOT 5010105 AT cygwin DOT com> <187072112 DOT 20140214234339 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <20140215125606 DOT GM2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1745533059 DOT 20140215225708 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <2826041 DOT 20140216062749 AT yandex DOT ru> <53004F35 DOT 4020301 AT googlemail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <53004F35.4020301@googlemail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 2/16/2014 12:40 AM, m0viefreak wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to accomplish with that patch,
> but it looks to me as if everything you want is already present:
>
>    cygpath --help
>
> states
>
>    -i, --ignore          ignore missing argument
>
> which outputs nothing if you pass it an empty argument (or even without
> any further argument at all).
>
> Isn't that ( cygpath -mli "$possibly_empty_var" ) what you need?

Well, if you're actually going to look at the existing functionality
of 'cygpath' before jumping into a thread, you're going to take all the
fun out of it for the rest of us. ;-)

Thanks for pointing out the flaw in my original reply and for providing
an answer that I believe Andrey will appreciate.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple