X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=fTDzuVraTyKSysbrUCOYppXI85EkLnYZVP1yiwoGt+ZE+SoGqYDxt
	ZLwOgjZvW04ERcHD4Ovv84M24rHg+DW2xTwcbMgyd9ApTIu+hBLA0exea4RA4ZSF
	TaeYbzICq+7at94DOB+mFRa/pdb65rY8VrTT51D5BgQXtFtdwfLBEk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=uifoCS203PBO/6Mb3qodLjKtpKQ=; b=TEC09g+b6sOv5Yr2+VvrCuW3SXN5
	audR6TfU5hpXnvfbavUlsrtwnV8ZfDRGW1tcGSGiuyOSS55WUz/RCWjAM3GH5uYU
	065QULmZKB1rxsmHv49HhRnzmV6/ZipId7jU7ODg6urEk7/4Odmx4AAfsGNd0Mpq
	EWtZxRzrpc9/Ihs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:14:57 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
Message-ID: <20140214141457.GF2246@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAKf2h5R3YvpMB2_18G9kr7DU5djftDXWorw1SyX76N+8BLoOOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140214104834 DOT GZ2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140214110042 DOT GB2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52FE1F3E DOT 2080901 AT cornell DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O2gaCPMlz9o7j9TI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52FE1F3E.2080901@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--O2gaCPMlz9o7j9TI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 14 08:50, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 2/14/2014 6:00 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 14 11:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Feb 14 11:16, Frank Fesevur wrote:
> >>>I've installed that snapshot on my work laptop, part of AD domain. I
> >>>moved passwd and group out of the way and noticed my .bashrc is not
> >>>executed.
> >>>[...]
> >>>Most noticeable difference between the two are in the dates of the
> >>>files (The months are in Dutch, and not in "long-iso") and not showing
> >>>the dot-files. Among others, I have set an export LANG=3Den_US
> >>
> >>...hopefully LANG=3D'en_US.utf8"...
> >>
> >>>and an
> >>>alias for "ls" in my bashrc for that.
> >>
> >>Hmm, off the top of my head I can't explain this.  Is that
> >>via mintty or a Windows console?  What does `id' print?  Is there a
> >>difference in upper/lower case of your name?
> >>
> >>[...time passes...]
> >>
> >>Oh, hang on.  I'm a tcsh gal, so I set /bin/tcsh in my AD domain entry.
> >>However, the default is *not* /bin/bash, but /bin/sh at the moment.  I'm
> >>a bit fuzzy on bash, but does bash read the .bachrc file only if it's
> >>called bash and not if it's called sh?  What happens if you symlink
> >>your .bashrc to .profile (Not that I suggest this as the ultimate
> >>solution, this is just for testing)?
> >
> >Ultimately, the right thing to do is either:
> >
> >- We switch Cygwin to use /bin/bash as default, instead of /bin/sh,
>=20
> Isn't /bin/bash already the default?  The output of `mkpasswd -l'
> seems to confirm this.

Oh, right.  I didn't remember that.  So I guess I should do the same
for automatically created entries, right?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--O2gaCPMlz9o7j9TI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=WH43
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--O2gaCPMlz9o7j9TI--