X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=hxNCMmQ5hi5dtTEKgEL+HINHXXnr
	QoVLsgxYSFQ/dBEsPbDGVBwbJ5uMd4PkDPuKzwenAm9sSJxtKWqi6Bwn/2lsEg+t
	i/LjjGSUCK5QXcUTe/c6Rc4hApkyllIWRX40BEyxj9SL2cvDa3u+YEkZwVjyOoP4
	5C6WpWJO9zWU990=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; s=default; bh=7yk9j6xur7rF/aS7EMWXthfiE0Q=; b=mX
	fvAgBWqydgDB9hhaul9csBMNrLS+zlAqBshjhcamXIsWdJmBqB4mmxSs/B3CYLfh
	HbsN9zhamNDOHyu3JTj8RSY2gxLM9uOYndhnmhBkjF9gT7rsCQC5ZcLsbUk7wLek
	8ha5+3Jd807HHdkUHy+67hKU3tZQxi6MIdJZqJ3ng=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: tangentsoft.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <52FD513D.2020408@etr-usa.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:36:06 -0700
Message-Id: <02978090-A341-448B-9BE0-8F312216F650@etr-usa.com>
References: <20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAAXzdLVtMzdNDdm9-4puB1jJngjONS=Wbq3TXmDrJKDHcBJ5Ow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <952874943 DOT 20140213200700 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FD513D DOT 2020408 AT etr-usa DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s1E7aQbe031130

On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com> wrote:

> If we save only 1/20 second (say 0.1 sec down to 0.05) per process launch, we can save tens of seconds on such a command sequence.
> 
> I look forward to testing this.

I decided to build R, since it’s big but fairly self-contained:

With a 4-processor XP VM, I can’t tell the difference between 1.7.28-2 and 1.7.29s (20140213) in terms of build time.  +/- a second or two over about 4.3 CPU-minutes of build time.  Configure time doesn’t change much, either.

My nsswitch.conf:

passwd: db
group:  db

I’ve tried it with /etc/files present and removed.

Waah.
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple