X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=YFF4GKKDdbUnGYUT
	5J+SQ7zvgMf+QcHR+SZhr9ME5aFzFmrokE1K0H/vdldJnMT+R16l1VedvwAm6zmK
	gKWRPNhz7Yj9fb1oWKdjw1AP3cao+rtOOhXmywwPK1i+1SO1FeBF0o5RzAKVAqNY
	VO/Numui6P6dVVquK5ghgnMdGX0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=4D1Gu5R5YnygKjGuMZO5/N
	9hgK0=; b=jtoquhzuw5FBLzg78gt0VShR3UvxgHYYVpYJMLjhGUNvjw04PZ6gsv
	PbflULipDuIjJmFq7w6gcwCTMs8789d1bH8a3x3X6u/1p2igXM89d4pezuiZJ4Lm
	wcmPZtVy4L6c7umE+eML0kuBJEPl7no1ncb1i9GCyjwXuiN+/0dqQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:12:44 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: Andrey Repin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-ID: <1845951283.20140214111244@mtu-net.ru>
To: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
In-Reply-To: <52FD513D.2020408@etr-usa.com>
References: <20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAAXzdLVtMzdNDdm9-4puB1jJngjONS=Wbq3TXmDrJKDHcBJ5Ow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <952874943 DOT 20140213200700 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FD513D DOT 2020408 AT etr-usa DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Warren Young!

> On 2/13/2014 09:07, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Steven Penny!
>>
>>> - Do you have any benchmarks available? Or instructions on how we could test the
>>>    speed of the new system?
>>
>> In the end of the day, this should affect program startup times. But in home
>> environment, the difference will be negligible.

> Whose home are we talking about here? :)

<3

> In my home, we type commands like ./configure && make && make install

> That sort of thing may launch and kill hundreds of programs in a short 
> period of time.

> If we save only 1/20 second (say 0.1 sec down to 0.05) per process 
> launch, we can save tens of seconds on such a command sequence.

> I look forward to testing this.

I'm, already. It seems, I'm ought to retract my "negligible" statement.
Even simple diff'ing is way faster now.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 14.02.2014, <10:39>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple