X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=qBZEhP4+b0dfqMnzq91bbJcLh77UixLAheCxc4pveFW
	vAYN0HevHoTThR/Zyeq6e0/1z7aKLItn9D9vLkwKwtul0LW8gx8GsHwyKT0hXNA6
	cqjClmow2eZRgnjjDP0v83hGYajqymy2YF0R1X/qLxp9ifMZxWF82j31fNNp4aFU
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=g3H7zcPGi3gGNBtnYtdqzSrpH6w=; b=ydXmsTiTt5VdQtDB9
	hB8IF4fdJTCSdwWNKhVjEYMTdVuso1NzRDwoRQbFUTtni3vZu1h5fXIo0nj1Nd7X
	+Us5xKbbvtyEZzErXgVjyB8SPywtpTvaDt5VnTYNyLLBkFjJgQcqR1WoxOdMu+Zz
	7YEnwxBAIWs47m+HW+eNfnnRFk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: etr-usa.com
Message-ID: <52FD513D.2020408@etr-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:11:57 -0700
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
References: <20140213143849 DOT GH2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAAXzdLVtMzdNDdm9-4puB1jJngjONS=Wbq3TXmDrJKDHcBJ5Ow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <952874943 DOT 20140213200700 AT mtu-net DOT ru>
In-Reply-To: <952874943.20140213200700@mtu-net.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2/13/2014 09:07, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Steven Penny!
>
>> - Do you have any benchmarks available? Or instructions on how we could test the
>>    speed of the new system?
>
> In the end of the day, this should affect program startup times. But in home
> environment, the difference will be negligible.

Whose home are we talking about here? :)

In my home, we type commands like ./configure && make && make install

That sort of thing may launch and kill hundreds of programs in a short 
period of time.

If we save only 1/20 second (say 0.1 sec down to 0.05) per process 
launch, we can save tens of seconds on such a command sequence.

I look forward to testing this.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple