X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=dAJbqwtdYapKlZIm JDTnLHPJ+rmvu7ZYhsdMFTV1Nl2/Sebclvz6XFtjS1ysthmcLYrm+Ux/z+LgVYJ7 AaWr3/W3cXTbrWWJGAOlBVcOA9Z5n4Y4OeoMIi26vorZMtSn66CQu72SBZOmZmZc l89BPuF8G/Q1zCz+hVUgteo43gs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=I6vCmnK90Yl9MP/xBhDk/d rWkYc=; b=R3b+BsW86YiUjI9saLuKw1RYpYJft06mdftm8Kg0cJSEcXA/eP8cOD u7cUeH5DjDlRcVIMwjNnFylnvfJM+eWZvvk5M1rDaZ0l6cC+DSmc4+rC+QAMZGzi l5kI8BpZDcogOLZ3oi+MNqOrhdQm/rnUzmFytyzhhoDewCqcNs1QQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:39:18 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: Andrey Repin Message-ID: <399125515.20140213153918@mtu-net.ru> To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?) In-Reply-To: <20140213100025.GB24159@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <52F92D58 DOT 9030408 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52F95D1D DOT 4050108 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <4510121021 DOT 20140211062515 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FAB14C DOT 8060800 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52FABAF5 DOT 2060701 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52FAD730 DOT 9090507 AT redhat DOT com> <20140212090804 DOT GM2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52FB9E51 DOT 7030607 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140212195931 DOT GA2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140212213729 DOT GA5589 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140213100025 DOT GB24159 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >> >There's only one tiny problem. Whatever I think about the full >> >enumerate being right or wrong, I have this vague feeling that I'd like >> >to have this implemented fully at one point. My cat disapproves, but we >> >can't agree on everything, I guess. Another configuration option in >> >/etc/nsswitch.conf might comfort her. >> >> I don't know if this has been mentioned but would a cache help here, >> i.e., nscd? I think that's how Linux deals with this type of situation. > Caching is wonderful for the usual requests for single entries from the > DB, and for this we have already two caches, the LSA cache and Cygwin's > own cache. But caching doesn't help at all when enumerating. > There's also the problem to rely on an external program. If it turns > out that the current implementation is too slow, I'm prepared to add > caching to cygserver to have a system-wide caching server, but Cygwin > shouldn't *require* that cygserver runs. And either way, it still > wouldn't help when enumerating all accounts. Another rock in the direction of caching. Caching security-relevant data 'en masse' is usually a not-so-good idea, and should be considered very carefully. Even for Linux, common recommendation is to disable nscd to improve security and reliability of the accounting data. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 13.02.2014, <15:36> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple