X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=NAyXrsTshvClMWzG 7eAAwfHD3Z9Oa6isOhvuRtXonZvhWBWMPMcWk3PE5PslpgMGixmcpOBr7dXlWmFK vSd2L8BJkM6LCVEqFXIdqiYru3Nl3nCx2PS+cpuP9EwxU+xKpz7zdNuCRW9xiylc J1S1GnP/lEzqt5ma/zsBlcAdfKA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=LNiXvffUkyO07Blz8A1DJ3 B+YgM=; b=NKRTWSWF2RaD1bYubAzl+v77ZICkLKiHzTI8VpQ+IjKny3AXlIwV3K ptDgqtRELkFFRA2F/nHv3SfEj+30D8ePdkxowManDkbfPL6dZkszH24ej8Zwn1SC amdCJh0smJKN1iyajXVU+Nxvex35hA5AVcew7VLapy+2FOgMHVfCo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ea0-f174.google.com X-Received: by 10.14.106.193 with SMTP id m41mr5362477eeg.62.1392225302620; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:15:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FBAC0B.8000106@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:14:51 +0100 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com CC: marshallst AT appstate DOT edu Subject: Re: g77 on cygwin64 References: <52FAF082 DOT 6020805 AT appstate DOT edu> <52FB0686 DOT 8080403 AT gmail DOT com> <52FB13E2 DOT 1070107 AT appstate DOT edu> <724410821 DOT 20140212111451 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <52FB8E3C DOT 3030704 AT appstate DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <52FB8E3C.3030704@appstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 12/02/2014 16:07, Scott T. Marshall wrote: > Thank-you to those that responded with suggestions involving my fortran > issues. Fixing the code is not something I am going to pursue since the > source code was written by several different colleagues and is spread > out amongst many .f files. My colleagues have no interest in fixing it > since they have g77 on their unix machines, and to them, it isn't > broken. The strange thing is that gfortran does compile the code, but > once compiled, the executables have strange behavior mainly involving > problems reading in data files. So it is not clear to me exactly what > needs to be updated in the code. > I have tried to compile gcc 3.4.6 from source with no luck, but I am not > so good with compiler flags and makefiles. I will give it a go again, > but I am not optimistic. > So, to avoid further mean comments about my course of action being > "stupid", I will sign off. > -Scott > Hi Scott As he wrote "Sorry for my terrible english...", I assume it was not intentional offensive. Coming back to your issue, it is really curious that gfortran compiles the code but behaves wrongly, I was expecting it rejects the code if not in line with latest standard. I saw rejected code with lapack some time ago, and the correction was trivial. But compiling and not working is a serious gfortran bug. Have you a "short test case" ? Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple