X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gXt5YRgK6wwJAVyve0hxDwPIlu02Hkt8I1WYPQdjtPv 9lPHu3cYXcKegkRgtE34K9gCKoc8QxS+Lc24XUZ8Ydq8osMHTa/78vG5NAzfk+wR JUF+L4iGdm/ZVGVkSTtLenqkoJ7NUVcZ+yGOPF8tGBNo7NbLAwdURn/mkuAMKvcg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=amPE3/H6VMrTyti7kUlFYYc3yyQ=; b=GdTDEsRi5QtB7lYKi 9U3dQKXVd/htsiNIQgMAxi4Hr8NZDvW0f00soOfskPuDMNqbjQvc9+0seF+n3J5h A1AHl3IPpY/cJ0Q8B3xxI1AwA+sbesB7kNwbYAnZwDNnZNAkOlqh7Ddj19f2D9Mu 4morn0J4gf61NSLJos8GfbOumo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.lysator.liu.se Message-ID: <52F8B50E.7040307@lysator.liu.se> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:16:30 +0100 From: Peter Rosin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?) References: <52F339CA DOT 5070305 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206090117 DOT GD2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F361C5 DOT 3000807 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206141321 DOT GI2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F40208 DOT 5030901 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140207094917 DOT GN2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F4E540 DOT 2010606 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52F51D19 DOT 6080807 AT etr-usa DOT com> <31347914-BB4F-4039-984B-731B6C72F903 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52F7AEC5 DOT 5090205 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <8B7B5FE0-7413-4358-BA8A-E0B6E0B17653 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: <8B7B5FE0-7413-4358-BA8A-E0B6E0B17653@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2014-02-10 10:02, Warren Young wrote: > On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:37 AM, David Stacey wrote: > >> On 09/02/2014 15:45, Warren Young wrote: >>> Results: >>> >>> /bin/cppcheck.exe >> >> As far as I can tell, cppcheck doesn't actually call getpwent() at all; this is a false positive turned up by strings(1). > > Yeah, there *has* to be a better way than strings(1) to extract an EXE's list of DLL imports. The linker does it somehow... objdump -x /bin/foo.exe Cheers, Peter -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple