X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=ROOKZqAzBo1gQdn9svDMVG/Q+3/n
	sI7D+43oATwYhS4J2P4ZVJFZfbzw4ocyHAD8d+QCMyrCa1HMzWkmlKxwE0K1HOOc
	ldaHmp19v48fM9+tL7pNDP24MjphIe0KKhcQykggQYVQbamvpnavw31uKFyk9pNv
	eQtZFoq3QZq4s7A=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; s=default; bh=FW/LmC7TMway0hiLxhrzm+qpToA=; b=Jf
	Upakn7u1SmG6HB8EGOBnUJEzIqaP+W2H60soNTJsNzaY9QiC2gBD4p1thCLJLijh
	zOXvk1EyUY3UIRxWOhDQ1s7zawZO0C/kGfCCUFkneLmql8K2kfAiBLPhRx5Id4qP
	O49X9Yt8hlcKmYNx5NBMe9QR76ceI5rXTl9tcSSaQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: tangentsoft.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?)
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <52F7AEC5.5090205@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 02:02:27 -0700
Message-Id: <8B7B5FE0-7413-4358-BA8A-E0B6E0B17653@etr-usa.com>
References: <52F339CA DOT 5070305 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206090117 DOT GD2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F361C5 DOT 3000807 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206141321 DOT GI2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F40208 DOT 5030901 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140207094917 DOT GN2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F4E540 DOT 2010606 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52F51D19 DOT 6080807 AT etr-usa DOT com> <31347914-BB4F-4039-984B-731B6C72F903 AT etr-usa DOT com> <52F7AEC5 DOT 5090205 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s1A92lFh002472

On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:37 AM, David Stacey <drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> wrote:

> On 09/02/2014 15:45, Warren Young wrote:
>> Results:
>> 
>> /bin/cppcheck.exe
> 
> As far as I can tell, cppcheck doesn't actually call getpwent() at all; this is a false positive turned up by strings(1).

Yeah, there *has* to be a better way than strings(1) to extract an EXE's list of DLL imports.  The linker does it somehow...
--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple