X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=yazEgPnvsTQfQfj5vGdr5sEe3Pue
	hXIDxFMzL6VNqRmm1X7GxnmLZW46hlUWo5s1r0SNSv2+r55JBPopZUMrEXFcOVdJ
	dZX6UxrdigcdS+O0JOClaDJeamlzPagohI9LiLI+BfWSXpJPuKW6HBkmDWuw2LFG
	PDn+aSVRRrXkZQc=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
	:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; s=default; bh=+znmXIfXeJb//2K24tVbAUe2ocM=; b=H6
	giysn2jJzOO1Jwj9vZHY2oTvxnMk+V1eg5A51WCkC6AgbAY/uYzo4KpaEqPiCbl9
	Jvg4CIH6mtdv1jFp885NKt4mkBg9YC8YNeaP5YcBLZtRwextZHsJoDczWiuvMmzo
	Ev+sb/FcUQiKumyMjTYxeKA4wUZ8RjbcY3pwKXDd0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: tangentsoft.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
Subject: Re: get rid of getpwent? (Was: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ?)
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <52F51D19.6080807@etr-usa.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 08:45:00 -0700
Message-Id: <31347914-BB4F-4039-984B-731B6C72F903@etr-usa.com>
References: <52F339CA DOT 5070305 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206090117 DOT GD2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F361C5 DOT 3000807 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206141321 DOT GI2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F40208 DOT 5030901 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140207094917 DOT GN2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F4E540 DOT 2010606 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52F51D19 DOT 6080807 AT etr-usa DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s19FjbvK023263

On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com> wrote:

> Here's a better check that doesn't give false positives:
> 
>    $ cat <<END > checkfile
>    #!/bin/sh
>    if egrep -q '_getgrent(32|64)' "$1" ; then echo $1 ; fi
>    END
>    $ find /bin -name \*.exe -exec ./checkfile {} \;

The strings(1) call got left out of that test.  Here’s a working variant, which tests for getpwent() calls instead:

    $ cat <<END > checkfile
    if strings "$1" | egrep -q '^getpwent$' ; then echo $1 ; fi
    END
    $ find /bin -name \*.exe -exec sh checkfile {} \;

Alas, Vim *does* call this API.  Results:

/bin/ali.exe
/bin/biber.exe
/bin/cppcheck.exe
/bin/emacs-nox.exe
/bin/emacs-w32.exe
/bin/emacs-X11.exe
/bin/fish.exe
/bin/gdb.exe
/bin/gvim.exe
/bin/joe.exe
/bin/mc.exe
/bin/nano.exe
/bin/otp.exe
/bin/pure-pwconvert.exe
/bin/tcsh.exe
/bin/vim.exe
/bin/xdvi-xaw.exe
/bin/xemacs-21.4.22.exe
/bin/xgettext.exe
/bin/ytree.exe

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple