X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=qn nvUGwt2co0z8fxZz6DeCv3zZLPsal0zaQNA5sp0ZQCQloSHGt1hbxYYPs1vh6+fk I9AO9H3S58FcFiCkYCR+lpN8CaEaECD/xn9S6kjbIF7HrisqMU9QMMqza+Bs9YyN 10ulY0OMpkXLhyi3Up1YXiVwc1M0Pvw/Sz8oadMzE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=ni+P9ASo J/6/PEW4UxDXhfIrr4s=; b=DQH+/mxhJK0m3yKV+QLOp16fZD1MAP2LXBV+Qv+h X2xFkhcfGZcgdNJh8QfghjGAavhB9xTJ9psVFD9QjgjyC8RoSw/g6/pQ2zDWLqEJ LgPJOyRfH65QaaAACa6EDKnTyFMQQCGahpjnX9yE6XKtJIrwoX5ShOBfpfztBpEP 3dE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lb0-f182.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.180.42 with SMTP id dl10mr369943lac.62.1391691610441; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 05:00:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F361C5.3000807@gmail.com> References: <52F339CA DOT 5070305 AT gmail DOT com> <20140206090117 DOT GD2821 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52F361C5 DOT 3000807 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:00:10 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cygwin-1.7.28 getpwent header declaration changes ? From: Jan Nijtmans To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Feb 6 08:29, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Is something slightly changed in the relative system headers ? After upgrading to Cygwin 1.7.28, Sqlite doesn't compile any more. See log below. When reverting to 1.7.27-2, everything is back to normal. The LOCK_EX macro's and friends are supposed to be defined when including : but they aren't any more. I added a: #define __BSD_VISIBLE 1 to sqliteInt.h (before all headers are included), then everything works again. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ============================================== sqlite3.c: In function 'flockCheckReservedLock': sqlite3.c:25869:38: error: 'LOCK_EX' undeclared (first use in this function) int lrc = robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB); ^ sqlite3.c:25869:38: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for e ach function it appears in sqlite3.c:25869:48: error: 'LOCK_NB' undeclared (first use in this function) int lrc = robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB); ^ sqlite3.c:25872:36: error: 'LOCK_UN' undeclared (first use in this function) lrc = robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_UN); ^ sqlite3.c: In function 'flockLock': sqlite3.c:25949:30: error: 'LOCK_EX' undeclared (first use in this function) if (robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB)) { ^ sqlite3.c:25949:40: error: 'LOCK_NB' undeclared (first use in this function) if (robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB)) { ^ sqlite3.c: In function 'flockUnlock': sqlite3.c:25998:30: error: 'LOCK_UN' undeclared (first use in this function) if( robust_flock(pFile->h, LOCK_UN) ){ ^ Makefile:563: recipe for target 'sqlite3.lo' failed make: *** [sqlite3.lo] Error 1 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple