X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=v+xzrX1ewlnMizFA
	jAiL97SonuqgUMLGNolnQxl9F6p5XRGyx1nmcDI9FaVVOs0tjZ1gHGVNdmEm74kH
	CTfaXTGxLrKYzblpt66/9xuqCScsSlA8Aa9I91dLbq4FiqsZrtPTPly/w635JPf9
	ilYKdu+aLGVC0NME79bus6+hrjk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=9zgOwO0+9oHRHnhSOsaVrp
	cGXwc=; b=l7W52EeBgwQyGFILP4zPqmo4FlyTKjrtyY0xUp927hAGJw4psQVEG5
	LCN/JVMuqPuVpUzaCbV8CiipSPIm79DOx7WnlZs29rhBHQ7gh2oIMM56fBD/ZV5G
	LCIuL4tnAtQXnHWf1i2Mgc0gRQL28GKlNCs5VmiZ36RlCrJaOn7+o=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173023pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <52E92ECF.5030007@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:39:43 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup.exe different packages
References: <CAO2ddnb5tMR_qVov8eDqmXeStvdgsV17eyL2mzwJvYJY41s2wQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <52E7C7C6 DOT 3000606 AT gmail DOT com> <CAO2ddnY2UjXnqGJ0ve3bLkH4pctYK-2YdrO1jVpJEjnbYQHwCg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAO2ddnby4SiW+AXyqLx6QdeRtGm7g-=zM71pWJyY5b1Fp=UpJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87y5203qn8 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <CAO2ddnajkJF00P292_dZMNoD8s1tjfHLpEmb0AiNsgZ5c0Fasw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20140129T130612-117 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <52E926B1 DOT 30804 AT breisch DOT org> <loom DOT 20140129T171045-295 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-reply-to: <loom.20140129T171045-295@post.gmane.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 1/29/2014 11:24 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Chris J. Breisch <chris.ml <at> breisch.org> writes:
>> No, I don't agree with that statement. I'd be more inclined to believe
>> that it's a bug in the command-line interface that doesn't allow you to
>> do what the GUI does.
>
> You can disagree all you want, the source of setup makes it pretty clear
> that all packages in category Base must always be installed, regardless of
> any other choices the user made.  And that's in fact what the GUI does too
> (it goes through exactly the same code path), only that you're later able to
> deselect the "binary" package without setup checking for whether you do this
> on a Base package (note you can't uninstall or skip a Base package, so that
> you can defeat this via other means is the bug I was talking about).

While I won't comment on whether this feature of the current setup is a
good one or not, it was an intentional addition meant for the power user.
It apparently is not reflected in the command line interface and shouldn't
be used as a common installation technique.  Circumventing the normal
dependency checking done by setup has the very real potential of leaving
you with a broken installation.  I believe this is the reason Achim calls
this feature a bug in setup's GUI.  If you want a working installation
and you aren't willing to deal with the problems this feature of the GUI
may present, don't use it.

I hope this explanation helps clear up the question of why there could be
a difference in the installation size depending on mode used.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple