X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=lt 6Fbi0mu8EoWQ1RZUPNgS0SWoiKrUr0Y3BkObGvERUcoQz91EVikIwTwGgWxgpXq7 SY+tsLE+6vGnqTFSc8ArJWxvQ+9Lnd96QI4siFI1ch1hsjfg/jjgNynzu9pi4uzE f4e3uhNM+ejAlZhzGbXXroz0Q3jQewuIhzY5FuxPQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=YDDii6dG otGinkx/BoRfLS2lFzc=; b=FjtxIo5cM3O7rjD43Pvb8hEK5qjT/oc2JeOs+PNB oMXERhZhRbCtvtekJDWSXZP0s33IAoH4Ke4KZybr3X1QTeEV/lLX4eORL6K5LrNV T7dFFubrefbuttjmN+ZsX+bfCQzt0Lno83lRykGHW3d87rCYSQ+CLd0miE1ilp7I TaU= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oa0-f47.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.22.18 with SMTP id z18mr5216652obe.42.1390987187485; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 01:19:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y5203qn8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <52E7C7C6 DOT 3000606 AT gmail DOT com> <87y5203qn8 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: setup.exe different packages From: BGINFO4X To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes > BGINFO4X writes: >> I did it, and the results are diferent. > > Because you made it so. > >> I attach on the email both setup results: with commandline and with GUI. > > So you managed to trick setup into not installing some Base packages in > the GUI. If you wouldn't have done that, you'd have installed the exact > same packages in both cases (I've checked). On my humble opinion, If I check ONLY bash with GUI, and I use the command-line "setup-x86.exe -g -o --no-desktop --no-shortcuts --no-startmenu --local-install %CYGWINALOCALPACKAGES% --quiet-mode --root %CYGWINADMINDIR% --packages bash" both results should be the same. Perhaps I'm wrong, and perhaps I need to understand how setup.exe works, but perhaps both results should be the same. ins't it? :) Thanks a lot for your time. >> What I'm doing is trying to install ONLY bash, not the Base category, >> so I think that you are wrong. > > You always have to have Base installed (which already includes bash). > If you really want to create your own installer you'd first need to > understand what setup.exe is doing and why. > > > Regards, > Achim. > -- > +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ > > SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: > http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple