X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Tx PnQmyqE43mpbLl5Athdr9MY3cdvXG7CU2wM+n/Qzzp1023iyAogt3zbUjrjdgwMY YOAOfOudfIna6NNf91CFMXzrIq6nLLieD6QWXPjb2ey6Q7qoTOOijBEt9rs1hbUV gpE4Hs/AZ5RZxhkBgGudAqxVZtJYkwGqXf1TPSEcQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=6xg0VJRU cSIJhTVL92h3OnSQr+8=; b=GTrArS/9vEooLkTqF6KpDwVhxE+NXOM/RD+onOr3 SLpTHb4QBJi64gWD/e+C9p8y8OcEA196uyvud+EBAin+PYncSKoZVj6rVfs1aikX 2EVMbCCbrQdRhEOyZi3+kzBP45wLPFW8RihwPAKtfrCED5iqioCpfteS+aY5y/Gr Qc8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ea0-f177.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.42.72 with SMTP id t48mr8423799eev.45.1390498159800; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:29:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52E143D7.4070604@gmail.com> References: <20140115105534 DOT GB31912 AT tastycake DOT net> <52E143D7 DOT 4070604 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:29:19 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Maintainer for git? From: Balaji Venkataraman To: Cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 23/01/2014 17:27, Balaji Venkataraman wrote: >> >> Sorry it took me a while to try out all the cases. >> > >> Wanting to eliminate any cygcrypto dll issues, I moved the existing >> dlls out of the way and re-installed libopenssl. The dll that got >> installed was identical in size and timestamp to .new but had >> different md5sums! I've included all md5sums in case one of you can >> verify which one you have. But the clone failed again. >> > > rebase changes the loading address so the md5sum will never match I wasn't aware of that - good to know. Thanks. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple