X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=yD9AQ7qQs/IXZHNIPF34iSJygB9B0FXw++zqUvUx4lMgq5jD2wpdv
	kAPC75411vKqX4UJspMGuot9R06fEnNl18zot4scIszViVdwMVWwDLmeGJrm6w/P
	BheVMldkRX5LNt1ogSk6lUF4smo+7Qcmy0/+GRcgSnWzQ1h5f2U2nY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=mQN2VZmQly1aF9UMMDI+7nHaUuA=; b=xaRKXfPwIQ2TRJLc6CWqwYaVKVtj
	7EG2KpExXkuqPqzDOjYkRRpDndVZONkZ/IU1UbpuPL7dSAYbwFmsFtsUNH9ONbRl
	nhqx0kvi1IxzXA9UQTVYRhgwRc9N8WA7q12d3DQxrFRNw2JxXoB9Un3By5+ylsed
	GFjoVN2niegDc18=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:32:09 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Win8 issue with pthread_once in ctor? (Re: Is there someone who have a same problem ?)
Message-ID: <20140123103209.GM2357@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CA+WgaY86qXwc9ywzjmU1x8B9WrpFnsQzFtvs6q5JLTRDFsEvHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <52DF5A6F DOT 2030509 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <CA+WgaY-7sVhxcKyaY=FZpSbiG3JW8N+KHRAh=oXyh_A3bWeH5A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <52E03E99 DOT 9050205 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <52E0A694 DOT 8090304 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B92bTrfKjyax39gr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52E0A694.8090304@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--B92bTrfKjyax39gr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jan 22 23:20, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2014-01-22 15:56, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> >>I believe that there is a problem when p11-kit command runs on the
> >>cygwin64 under Windows 8.
> >
> >Confirmed with a fresh Windows 8 x64 installation, but not with 8.1.
> >I'll have to look into this further.
>=20
> Here's what I've found so far:
>=20
> So far only with Cygwin64 on Windows 8.0 x64 (but not with Cygwin32
> even on 8.0 x64, nor with Cygwin64 on Windows 7 or 8.1), running any
> of the p11-kit commands in ca-certificates' postinstall under strace
> shows an exception c0000005 at 0x180134b75 immediately after loading
> /usr/lib/pkcs11/p11-kit-trust.so, which translates to:
>=20
> $ addr2line -fp -e /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll 0x180134b75
> verifyable_object_isvalid at
> /usr/src/debug/cygwin-1.7.27-2/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:144
>=20
> And eventually on a call to that function:
>=20
> verifyable_object_isvalid (objectptr=3Dobjectptr AT entry=3D0x239c68,
> magic=3Dmagic AT entry=3D3742232649, static_ptr1=3Dstatic_ptr1 AT entry=3D0x0,
> static_ptr2=3Dstatic_ptr2 AT entry=3D0x0,
> static_ptr3=3Dstatic_ptr3 AT entry=3D0x0)
> at /usr/src/debug/cygwin-1.7.27-2/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc:140
> 140   if((static_ptr1 && *object =3D=3D static_ptr1) ||
> 144   if((*object)->magic !=3D magic)
> [Inferior 1 exited with code 030000000005]
>=20
> Now the strange thing about this module is that it has a constructor
> which calls pthread_once() on a function which creates a recursive
> mutex, so just dlopen()ing is enough.  Unfortunately, my attempts to
> reproduce this with an STC have not been successful.
>=20
> Corinna, cgf, any insights?

Except for the content of object apparently being off, no.  It would
be helpful to build p11-kit with debugging and without optimization
and then step right into it, otherwise it's pretty hard to say
anything useful.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--B92bTrfKjyax39gr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=0IbW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--B92bTrfKjyax39gr--