X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=yere2i6 Sa17JmdGXsMyqpkQE4di26EteNYmUH7QHo9LYqwCkiuz/3jVZzLbiC+3iqdutRX+ pUWBZQ/3UFFb6U82wY6JwGVnjxHWpyaxrjZVWUS61OI6brCO1dwif9pqpICaT+FS B2ltN+vuHJBKrqNOXRYxQL7oNZgX4p2iRZoI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=SN+G7TFboVGgW yDx8V+RVVdntto=; b=Z9UF337VZLYR97buBlJFBQInWIas/zmv5zUXBc4hYnhsm wGPwBMqt1ycNfRiPaJ3TqU7C6giwtQRSuyAC/u7Pcu6yXRVGedyUo9ilJrPjz2ix PymXdgWmarrkfxnxd8cP+JkK+5PVBe57FXqZch087mavJ7ScWsEsAvviTNDP3U= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-oa0-f44.google.com X-Received: by 10.60.47.228 with SMTP id g4mr2023704oen.10.1390406774111; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:06:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140122150721.GA6650@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20140122055830 DOT GB4286 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140122150721 DOT GA6650 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> From: David Boyce Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:05:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cygcheck and literal plus sign To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > So I'll change my answer to "I don't know". How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple