X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=oOFt vKRAo/i91PVSrIeRP3FDdACRSpC7WGN8VeRf1v5XYG28HkQgYChVJ2ZigIouwJ3x dNVSERgyThPlejW7MXtWL5a4h0bsqaEbv2oemfl4glYE3K7lcRGloHKrofQ2skGP nnNNn/UZnbViv79jAa/ljhISo6tdoONQonoJw8U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=A9rOokOCTz A2kiqtWUkePqL9aSE=; b=K4Jwm8Dcdxwj4NsERPyjtxEF5pgrQPSx1l2pTyofYh IgKyRWygDxJo3Jr/yz4W+fLZPMyqeS0UStLTDhCqlx8qjo9/3wRVmjd6CdYOg81W +5URwNaMVg2PKzTRkgAU93UyE5M+YCaHl44l1078tIwYT5AtqK5qpl0j/8Hf93CT k= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: tishler.net Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:13:34 -0500 From: Jason Tishler To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Add retry logic to rebaseall Message-ID: <20140117161333.GA59772@tishler.net> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20140116061906 DOT GA1992 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140116085431 DOT GB26205 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140116085431.GB26205@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 09:54:31AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 16 01:19, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:23:08PM -0500, David Boyce wrote: > > >Jason et al, > > > > > >Here's a suggested new flag (with patch, attached) for > > >/usr/bin/rebaseall. It adds a -w(ait) flag which causes the check for > > >running Cygwin processes to be done in a loop, breaking out and doing > > >the rebaseall as soon as it finds a quiescent moment. > > > > +1 > > > > Seems like a good idea to me. > > ACK. Jason, shall I apply the patch? AFAICT, there is a race condition issue with the proposed functionality. David's build servers could be quiescent when the check for running processes is performed, but they could restart before the rebase is finished. I realize the window is very small, but it is nevertheless nonzero, so the rebase could still fail. The patch could be enhanced to check the status of the rebase and retry if the rebase failed and the wait option was specified. This would fix the race condition. There are also formatting issues with the patch. For example, the addition of the while loop requires lines to be shifted to the right. I know rebaseall unfortunately has a mixture of tabs and spaces, but after applying the patch some lines are not indented correctly. IMO, the proposed functionality is very specialized and doesn't seem to be generally applicable. This functionality could also be implemented (by the few who need it) as a very simple wrapper script that calls rebaseall until is succeeds. This approach would also workaround the race condition. I'm not enamored with this change, but I will go along with the consensus. If we decide to move forward, then I would like the race condition and formatting issues resolved. Thanks, Jason -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple