X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=T8/3YlDL4C8ViBda
	P7tP5vH+OYeh9l7/wPbqyVSpsTZEg8x03Mr1gvYdeM/TKlfsduX5W+Ox5bRq1FC8
	LyhX7Q+I33mM5rtYOI1kxEZWK7e4iNxBjWJr8++7jRtIzp/2LuVzknbomPDiZrqQ
	Lf8DPqUowI8In6V4m6CPRWfCisk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=tiuOL5FI/AamWK6xAIEuqz
	OEVcA=; b=wRy86VYNNSay6GD11w6MsVLGXLhYUKygsYWaQhcjjAEMReo/69A/EJ
	rouAJ/FfwKaRdRKfZyRDhvwCQWkPY1JA+b/GVIn9hdt8Wj8DgNPjnzw4TocUUYqX
	xLLi8C06oEW+oeWDH9XU5SfnqmMKrBwzEvNFsJF6wYJgBvzw2XwgM=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <52D84B20.9040103@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:12:00 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup-x86 wants to install libusb0?
References: <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E273075143E1D AT S1P5DAG3C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E273075143EA6 AT S1P5DAG3C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET>
In-reply-to: <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E273075143EA6@S1P5DAG3C.EXCHPROD.USA.NET>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 1/16/2014 3:36 PM, Jim Garrison wrote:

<snip>

> I figured out the dependency issue ... I was looking at an old
> setup.ini.   It appears the latest libusb-win32 (1.2.6.0) DOES
> depend on libusb0, so that's legit.
>
> However, I still can't figure out why setup is not aware of the
> existence  of libusb-win32. Any pointers on how to fix this would
> be appreciated.

Uncheck "Hide obsolete packages".

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple