X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=mvuk/wQ06AUPDF/YV4entpFoH/ZV52xCvrZXaY57Gsg B8YnvH7AsyplfYfIjx+5iX8h4S/Sj7RCdaTUEnnf+9h9M+3NfBUATOA0hXneX546 ApRZRO2a6y3cjkCT9+Xc7Z8wbhtmoD/dEt9qCiGNLCQLygLdb6/0mPRO9nQNo6uE = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=m4AbryWNXo4/XuvUBnQBSlJe4sM=; b=xweOA76+MbI0zHoOR +inP03hAdZY7fJ0saaIAwW/1+lQ57D78G9PInUWEzFdKpLVL2chDe8Q6M0pNNZbq q9gTHSGLrMnpmuTWba6ZU4Gd2A4spj2Ue3V1p6/F7RN/1ThRHPi+6weEP39EIhFB dDjgZy2wAccFoSGNUxjEFWLhow= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f180.google.com X-Received: by 10.42.224.194 with SMTP id ip2mr1796038icb.91.1389641705922; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:35:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52D43FED.4060803@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:35:09 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Base 64-bit Cygwin now requires Perl? References: <52D424E6 DOT 7010105 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140113182252 DOT GB7186 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20140113182252.GB7186@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2014-01-13 12:22, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, I didn't upload the 64-bit groff. This is one of the reasons > why I had reservations about people other than the package maintainers > uploading packages. The end result is that I'm forced to deal with > someone else's decision. This has been the case for a few of my > packages, uploaded during the 64-bit transition. If I had created the > package I might have paused at the perl dependency since clearly groff > is part of base. There is no practical difference in packaging between your 1.21-2.i686 and 1.22.2-1.x86_64; they both include basically the same scripts, and therefore *both* should rightly depend on perl. Probably the best solution to avoiding the perl dep in Base is to split up groff as on Fedora, where 13 perl scripts plus their manpages and data are in a separate groff-perl package. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple