X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=yQxJgz4tyR8uD3oUUNHB2MtwjgshvKKt7TH4sszUdMm Ou7Vby6yjnAvCMGtry6YUVpBb4bIOiV3JF51aPvOzIw1sN/ByHieEnpNmt+Jwkvo ZCtadlIq4/0/PIiF3cEtX3UT+cEDAUyvjl/CEmz9DHVvfcmotVwG4yRkbxifP60c = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=GBydlWfHvtseRbLnHUyezmY3NCA=; b=f/f8ExM+Y1qOK1vy2 dFKN38J2+xiYQzmbJubSrfN5YknB6gLX8IAsJm/wySK7agKWs9rMrmyJONZXs5gb N5TPoX26ZMNCdUSvI8i8CxjIKS7lp8P4WzoSgx7Pw2dDw1y4eKtbYIgzL96686gT IbEfIa+bweuGmyznBxi82LVihI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: etr-usa.com Message-ID: <52D43422.70107@etr-usa.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:44:50 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Base 64-bit Cygwin now requires Perl? References: <52D424E6 DOT 7010105 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140113182252 DOT GB7186 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20140113182252.GB7186@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 1/13/2014 11:22, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > In retrospect, it would have potentially made sense to use the same > versions and packaging for the 64-bit as for the 32-bit. That might > have minimized this type of problem. An argument could be made that since these helper programs are not core to groff's mission, groff does not literally *depend* on Perl. That is, if Perl is missing, groff doesn't stop running. That argument feels lawyerly to me, though. If the scripts are extracted into a separate package, I'll be installing it. I wish I'd known about groffer long ago. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple