X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=MKpLEHdAzvxZ9givzjM5NqnQNflB+bVAK3p0D3xCUW7
	cDf0uAQ7BfjewP5EIWX7XG1+EdxjxxNVwXUCXi760sOC9iZ/Xke/UuI3tnNy3DX9
	V+5uFW+qmwbif6S3VkytnkakJVATHs416ySHdrqCWWvtSVZOUT1GWQyeg/T44T4k
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=cubglhza41litMPisRa/8OhH0U0=; b=Wmjkg0cQPKDEErquC
	t7Y/9ZE9SFdSzPPAKZjtUWQBuyRD9veBC9gXwdImXHImhR4S0sKmizcfMNINrTpa
	oPJ9l7htkyo7rT5uK4UnSIyZuIqNFr/tV0NldRadKPCFSGpMjKB1wDl28qS3t8xy
	zLlGjy0J6kod1Ftvb1dnEHAQXE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mailout2.w1.samsung.com
From: Pavel Fedin <p DOT fedin AT samsung DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <001701cf0e08$e399abe0$aacd03a0$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20140110135208 DOT GG10296 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <002301cf0e10$6c1ed7e0$445c87a0$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20140110150726 DOT GH10296 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-reply-to: <20140110150726.GH10296@calimero.vinschen.de>
Subject: RE: Bringing up NFS server on 64 bits
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:48:14 +0400
Message-id: <002701cf1023$0e4b0110$2ae10330$%fedin@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id s0D5mb4x010961

 Hello!

> Not necessarily.  If the package is in a good shape, has no known
> security issues, and works fine with the latest Cygwin, you're good.
> Other than that, just keep an eye on the Cygwin ML if somebody reported
> a problem with your packages and see if you can lend a hand, maybe.

 This doesn't sound too bad.

> This is a generic problem.  Maintaining packages does not actually cost
> a lot of time, unless you're trying to stick to the bleeding edge or
> try to maintain too many packages.  But people still shy away from that
> without even trying.  That's pretty disappointing.

 Ok, i will try to.
 So far:
 Packages to update: rpcgen, nfs-server
 New package: rpcbind

 Is rpcgen maintained or not ?

 And, nobody has answered the question. Who are original authors of this NFS server ?

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple