X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Qu uJhlhDUF4d9Wx5A8QVCbwEReqSHmqvTRKyK30sN0GIO4BQqoAi4yU5Px/fjXPCes W8ofCTmG1quUysoQaZbv71RZL0nLmAtTWgDe+Nrl3hNVTAtfBQrPscarXnib2JuV rzjITWPpSi3qHeduTdSGPh6/c2wEWnf/aEJ+JiqS0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=X0kScchv owxW3PtsI0Ummt7EFnw=; b=LzoNK5EDixPHzKrz6ejEhidTOKFbyA0wr1l+ttf2 hzs8GcXi8YlHkef8+RgMJ/b9fw6Urk7ykNgZuJD12crWnDb1m8Car8xSn3Of1Tjv IASRGZ2E30zvEwNlnbvQ0aEAvDwnQuKvedGQQD7Q95faXJI0FokTA7KQHefDTOlO 3Ok= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qa0-f52.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.52.34 with SMTP id q2mr1540180qeo.10.1389316729246; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:18:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140108165730.GD4931@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20140108063628 DOT GA1732 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140108165730 DOT GD4931 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:18:49 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: about cygwin_stackdump() From: KIMURA Masaru To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes > You made it harder than necessary to debug your problem. > > If you had created a very small test case which demonstrated the issue > with clear instructions for building it, then this back and forth > wouldn't be necessary. > > Actually, even that would likely not have been necessary if you had just > provided the error message that you were getting from fopen(). > > i.e., http://cygwin.com/problems.html sorry for bother you about this. > Exporting this function is an ancient mistake but we are stuck with > keeping it around to maintain backwards compatibility. There is > no guarantee that the stackdump you get from this is correct and > we have no plans on augmenting it further. > > That said, however, I've made changes to cause the file handle of > the stackdump file to be closed. It will be in today's snapshot when > it shows up. > > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ ACK, thanks. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple