X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=aGJy7JEUxD2BO0fC9hzhU1JL+twyJJqtZKstJ96izxU XsCu+mVNmYT4o657iZ/Do9bBJHs2NW3krfXOlfhYWmpnQVLiP8pDIYch8+ml4kUL gI+HMscjNamspQmKfbqhBh4fUhc8n55IkwxQfARSITp9ewWQDQmiZkbAOREJBT64 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8cRe7HmvlujobRvBs6O/mEHM4uk=; b=d2fVlAI8Bfv/EzZuO ruzPwxNXTpgWIKQNBav2anMIjazHcX93c6kos46ZOkKxLd98uOMeNkx9ajVCEd46 aRwZVUC/kMpKZwIHf2NTX7EVuXrvCCSLpwZQlkM1YYTzi9+reQHYktLPRMU1cADR SZr1Gn0sy+NeGDULudkRj0mnxY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: kautler.net X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O/ig1zRRHPTY/9wSTRfIDyT/oX6qZIxy+7sRxh0jpc0=; b=Cd1uYMmHpeVX0zOJJLFG7yXvkgYpEIaR9B8PYjhvItoxWnn9Qqkh/11vYj0lfiM7D8 5uKMlyNpYeCU9uag+fiLP2IJPlox3xLQcJ88eM+wvceJ/RWTS78GdP0JiRyb7e6G+Hf0 mYbkIhm5wCnu4lKQBK/gHv6+MyKIKtt2Fc7ZiSf2fuT9DOO9oQ9++43SIoMW06K1wm7Y iw22qfSaz4/6W21Xqabfi/7/usZFhGqLUqvK0042cVuwMfFpIOZ4U4ieiO3znmuc1YyI HC2ZvJl+MIIeaNpX1lo+EH4Nnuzj7HhFK5k/KJIlWNUpC8qVRXHgTp00rlC1pN46s9xK IGpA== X-Received: by 10.49.51.66 with SMTP id i2mr32985498qeo.26.1386594008664; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 05:00:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20131209125119.GJ2527@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <52096B42 DOT 8010702 AT Kautler DOT net> <20131206171721 DOT GA7240 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20131206234833 DOT GC3154 AT phoenix> <20131209125119 DOT GJ2527 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Kautler?= Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:59:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-7.3.1152-1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id rB9D0bsU005614 Again, what I talk about is NOT an issue of vi vs. vim. What I talk about is a breaking change in vim that was introduced while doing a change for vi. But it is NOT an issue of vi vs. vim. Here again my original mail: Hi Yaakov, I'm wondering that noone mentioned it before, but maybe everyone is using ~/.vimrc or they were not as puzzled as me and tried to find out what went wrong. After updating to your latest vim build 1152, vim started to behave really unexpected, no syntax coloring, only one undo step and doing undo again did a redo, ... In the meantime I found out that your 7.3-virc.patch is the culprit, it replaces # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "$VIM/vimrc" by # ifdef FEAT_NORMAL # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "/etc/vimrc" # else # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "/etc/virc" # endif which changes system vimrc file from /etc/vim/vimrc to /etc/vimrc for normal vim usage. This way no options are set and vim starts its strange behaviour. I guess the new block of code should probably more likely be # ifdef FEAT_NORMAL # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "$VIM/vimrc" # else # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "$VIM/virc" # endif or at most # ifdef FEAT_NORMAL # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "$VIM/vimrc" # else # define SYS_VIMRC_FILE "/etc/virc" # endif Regards Björn 2013/12/9 Corinna Vinschen: > On Dec 9 13:34, Frank Fesevur wrote: >> 2013/12/9 Björn Kautler: >> > I don't have a problem with being mean. >> > Everyone makes mistakes. >> > I just wonder that it gets broken silently without obvious (to me) reason >> > and a question regarding it and with two proposed solutions just stays >> > ignored while it would be very easy to fix. >> >> To me, the best way to fix these problems is simple: start using >> alternatives again just like before vim-7.3.943-1. It makes everybody >> happy. You don't need to know if just vim-minimal or the full vim is >> installed. And whether you are used to typing "vi" or "vim", both >> commands start the best available version of vim. >> >> I don't understand why it was removed anyway. I brought up the >> question before and never got an answer. > > The new vim layout closely reflects the Fedora packaging. It has a > minimal vi in the vim-minimal package and a full-featured vim in the > vim-enhanced package. I'm using a vi -> vim alias on Fedora for ages. > > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple