X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Xa R4iu9qTkoNSLA/6WnTVnsBIVxbLF3W66hdKIm6XNDKvcSbb63FFg6Rh5mTB7TjoD vgZ9jMQuZmqx9fqscaoKXwcP0hMwWPSIfwo7tW1sBB48ox6nrVyge0pe7ebGG1FX uvvx4fWmY6aLq+wXv7uZSt1qGgVP8DksE/SP5PnV8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=iSNyVc07 MuUUikeZNFJdwpOr3J0=; b=Z9hAJ9vKVJPK2why2mkIE7b5oYnE3s8xze9iYjDt 4MXTdamSm7rAKE6xIZKBkz6csghKdK49dSLtiS9SOP3EjnbQt+PHL7bjoK69EmR7 ruNKrDMzJpF+KxThgZJj16fpKAAPSYuwK8DRIPsh/GgbT+fSpyp1BY47sb8HZcN4 c1Q= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pb0-f44.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.149.73 with SMTP id ty9mr52489271pab.36.1385744377567; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:59:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5298B56F.1020605@gmail.com> References: <5298B4A5 DOT 8070100 AT gmail DOT com> <5298B56F DOT 1020605 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:59:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Binutils 2.23.51 compilation problem From: Frew Cen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes > Looks like a bug in the docs. You should report this problem to > the public binutils mailing list . I'm not sure if the problem is there. I get similar message when compiling (now not installing) mingw binutils. Would some from the older versions work? Frew --- config.status: creating po/Makefile.in config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing libtool commands config.status: executing default-1 commands config.status: executing bfd_stdint.h commands config.status: executing default commands make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'info'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/src/binutils-2.23.2/build/bfd/po' make[3]: Entering directory '/src/binutils-2.23.2/build/bfd' make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'info-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory '/src/binutils-2.23.2/build/bfd' Makefile:1617: recipe for target 'info-recursive' failed make[2]: *** [info-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/src/binutils-2.23.2/build/bfd' Makefile:2509: recipe for target 'all-bfd' failed make[1]: *** [all-bfd] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/src/binutils-2.23.2/build' Makefile:841: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple