X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=kl0JYUZwFDEmjWaZ
	QVPciO20WKJ8SE1jjCB5stDcludJKWksDWWOBYSmXZ1xncx3ATiflE3PHDep4zId
	xBrpBUwfyelB2vd/7lkKvLAPsSN9naUpozO170nrMOpPxeN2HLvxiv5y5Sdm6Cx9
	2Z51rZYJE5Dc6y/OkYXCDWi/i5c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=UmqL2jQXgkZOAHRx+Z5bW0
	dVJxs=; b=Hv5MZDjftvxLev5MjTit8zT72o8elr1Rr6sZakoTpWeTpCTsn7gXg/
	CB+nz71YGbru8zlTTqj4faCKUDZU3hj2m9DF0EOp4oK5RYarCrU0H8pnYXj1cwLl
	6as045TmfijAq8SfH6CEm+q43U44V6FoWwsy9eJwnybaGBgqYFpNQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173025pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <5293A4DF.7010601@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:28:31 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin64: Rebase problems
References: <5274DCA9 DOT 7020408 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <52910365 DOT 6040205 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
In-reply-to: <52910365.6040205@tiscali.co.uk>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 11/23/2013 2:35 PM, David Stacey wrote:

<snip>

> However, for all DLLs in /usr/lib, the new base is always zero - so I see
> entries of the form:
>
>      /usr/lib/cygsqlite3_mod_impexp.dll: new base = 0, new size = 10000
>      /usr/lib/cygsqlite3_mod_xpath.dll: new base = 0, new size = 10000
>
> I assume that this is wrong (although I'd be grateful if someone would
> confirm that). Further, there are two suspect entries together at the top of
> the log:
>
>      /usr/bin/libtk8.5.dll: new base = 524600000, new size = 120000
>      /usr/bin/libzsh-5.0.2.dll: new base = 5d9670000, new size = a0000
>
> The base address for these two seems too high, and again I suspect that
> these are wrong.

Yes, these both don't look right.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple