X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=DYQlWeAOQrnE+nIEisFkyuC7GKnhQ XYXApUwZ00IfY1vWxEla3cSpD1COiJtrOu36GvSumJJg/zfDp6xlW3izZFeXbfp3 06POV+uiAr1nnFgxo7oFrsdVOkdS5coLjcW73y1OsKzmE9LI7W0I8T/7djfQLyJQ 8H5aiiN1wS5WDM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=VLJbNcHnzvK5TgBy848I737Lzxo=; b=kif bQMXqeQ2111HtdqLue1ngbIdxqDMIEflDVxex9cUQm+HeirbsJ1OwEuCEf43lva3 6jAPbG3isGgNCJX5g7aMRDpi2U9paUawF84W/1bRC3AWUgEnipXJt0vS+QZ4rPhj gVd+DSxwpKwpmU7C1PN1iozt3pOSNII/sQKjOUnM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_95,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: gwo3.mbox.net X-USANET-Received: from gwo3.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by gwo3.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.82G) with ESMTP id 303RksXpl3248Mo3; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:41:37 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 5 gwsout-gwsd Q:gwsd X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus X-USANET-GWS2-Tenant: nwea.org X-USANET-GWS2-Tagid: NWEA X-USANET-Source: 165.212.120.254 OUT jim DOT garrison AT nwea DOT org S1P5HUB3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID256RksXpl2587Xo3 From: Jim Garrison To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:41:20 +0000 Message-ID: <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E273041FDF178@S1P5DAG3C.EXCHPROD.USA.NET> References: <1384839303 DOT 14356 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web125203 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20131119100343 DOT GA27525 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528B93E6 DOT 3030802 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131119171330 DOT GF2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528BAC3D DOT 9070506 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20131119190343 DOT GG2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528BBA1A DOT 2080209 AT cygwin DOT com> <20131119202958 DOT GH2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20131119202958.GH2936@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id rAJNgHZa002265 > On Nov 19 14:20, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > > On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Looks like it, yes. What on earth were they thinking? > > > > Who says they were thinking? ;-) > > Point. > > I found what happened: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en- > us/library/windows/desktop/dn302074%28v=vs.85%29.aspx Hmm... from the quoted link: We have made some significant changes in how the GetVersion(Ex) APIs work in Windows 8.1 due to undesirable customer behaviors resulting from how the GetVersion(Ex) APIs have been used in the past. Pesky customers won't behave the way we want them to... (sinister music)