DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Rgk35Mgaq89tjaTN
	fPwspth+LIG+ZUlV+eBnySS4DOD/EEILbDXk2+t/zfQzwt49eBXQ8vC2GB3GzhJX
	+mWUEk3plE7vuw4rU1VcTwHkhaf/LqdB1fM5iEIJY4hAYIOZHMGzxOAnTiRSVqnB
	+fgle+EYZh66r4SB537geUhjnuQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <528BBA1A.2080209@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:20:58 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygcheck -svc segfaults on Windows 8.1 with cygwin64
References: <1384839303 DOT 14356 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web125203 DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20131119100343 DOT GA27525 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528B93E6 DOT 3030802 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131119171330 DOT GF2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <528BAC3D DOT 9070506 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20131119190343 DOT GG2936 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-reply-to: <20131119190343.GG2936@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 11/19/2013 2:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 19 13:21, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 12:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> Why do they have to make such a mess out of a simple function like
>>> GetVersionEx?  It returns different OS version numbers based on the
>>> existence of a manifest in the executable.  How dense is that?
>>>
>>> So we have thousands of executables, none of them has a 8.1 manifest.
>>> As a result, the uname() function returns OS versions 6.2 rather than
>>> 6.3.  Aaaaaargh.
>>>
>>> In cygcheck I added a patch to check dwBuildNumber this morning.  If
>>> it's >= 9200, it's 8.1/2012R2, otherwise 8/2012.  But that doesn't
>>> fix the OS version number of course.  Sigh.
>>>
>>> I'm going to tweak the OS version number and I'll do the same in
>>> Cygwin's uname function as well.
>>
>> Good grief. I suppose I need to add something similar to
>> /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe...
>
> Looks like it, yes.  What on earth were they thinking?

Who says they were thinking? ;-)

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple