X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=NUDmVHfMgHPSocuKOuace/9Aqp79LC2IJE7BhXksryf
	ynK21tge10pvU4jXS72S6uuk63FB18MsfvZxcH9m7UYD02mQFvAlSi/IXH+c25Rg
	EQA46F7lX5xmQ7CCrSDU5GxC/PLK2ThiMQ2drBK5ghsrankPwptj4SdBv0CGw2+k
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=Z09uGkc0MBpgWbTabVOpVxqVj1A=; b=Vwwr0ssj+FS+GpzhQ
	rixFI9HHhqDvBnqrgASKSXcA2SLBMDP1jwaLxhaoHZ2UAxfn+J83I5VUMQKc3gwP
	VzqVWL+sRbaNd6uC5nexgSnbUpC4w4FIO6NMzgnowQVR+tk22db3sbDa2iFz2Iju
	KQHFwenRPbOsLZzj03Y2VqSTz4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-bk0-f51.google.com
X-Received: by 10.205.14.69 with SMTP id pp5mr16127420bkb.14.1384860232247;        Tue, 19 Nov 2013 03:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <528B4A44.90104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:23:48 +0100
From: marco atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Is package-grep.cgi's desig architecture biased?
References: <CAC2zJ1te9zA2uGcUJM0c57X9ivr9t523-n7YgK52X7VCbB-L8g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC2zJ1te9zA2uGcUJM0c57X9ivr9t523-n7YgK52X7VCbB-L8g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Il 11/19/2013 12:04 PM, Sophoklis Goumas ha scritto:
> Hello everyone, and a special hello to this mailing list's regulars!
>
> Shouldn't the following:
> http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra
>
> return results for both x86 and x86_64 architectures?
>
> Sophoklis
>
the two reports are separated

http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=cygutils-extra&arch=x86_64

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple