DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=MzQHAg/VyCCPDMEK
	knwwqxmjTTfIT8K0WWcSVsq7UEbALpeRDFX1SRjIRwDJ0U9EcSRbeMga1puWjPNO
	IzbXneaj0+vHaUOg/ojfxJo3HGE17wm+0aLDZtrwqliY/svf5rOC9kIcs5jZ3+xk
	tHWBQy+3EYFaxFuc0VBSzGfbCnE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <528A5E19.8020305@cygwin.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:36:09 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: can not mount Windows shares correctly
References: <8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E60C2B6951F1 AT server03 DOT company DOT internal>
In-reply-to: <8CCC8F85C5F2784387A32FAD835FB4E60C2B6951F1@server03.company.internal>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 11/18/2013 1:08 PM, DEWI - N. Zacharias wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Situation : A windows shared NAS to which I can connect using
>
> net use \\\\192.168.109.252\\storage /user:PC06\\user1 passwd
>
> but then it is not possible to mount it to lets say /cygdrive/b
>
> mount   \\\\192.168.109.252\\storage /cygdrive/b
>
> mount: warning - /cygdrive/s does not exist.
> mount: defaulting to 'notexec' mount option for speed since native path
>         references a remote share.  Use '-f' option to override.

The mount worked fine, as you can see from below.

> But
>
> $ mount
> //192.168.109.252/storage on /cygdrive/b type smbfs (binary,notexec,noacl,u=
> ser)
> C:/cygwin/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin on / type ntfs (binary,auto)
> B: on /cygdrive/b type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> D: on /cygdrive/d type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> E: on /cygdrive/e type vfat (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> F: on /cygdrive/f type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> H: on /cygdrive/h type nwfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
>
> And:
>
> $ ls -al /cygdrive/b/
> ls: cannot access /cygdrive/b/: No such file or directory

As expected, since you haven't provided the authentication necessary yet.

> If I use
>
> net use b: \\\\192.168.109.252\\storage /user:PC06\\user1 passwd The command completed successfully.
>
> The result is slightly different:
>
>
> $ mount
> //192.168.109.252/storage on /cygdrive/b type smbfs (binary,notexec,noacl,u=
> ser)
> C:/cygwin/bin on /usr/bin type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin/lib on /usr/lib type ntfs (binary,auto) C:/cygwin on / type ntfs (binary,auto)
> B: on /cygdrive/b type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> C: on /cygdrive/c type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> D: on /cygdrive/d type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> E: on /cygdrive/e type vfat (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> F: on /cygdrive/f type ntfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> H: on /cygdrive/h type nwfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
> S: on /cygdrive/s type smbfs (binary,posix=3D0,user,noumount,auto)
>
> ls -al b:/
          ^^^
This is not POSIX path syntax.  Any unexpected behavior from using this path
syntax isn't considered a bug.

> ls: cannot access b:/..: No such file or directory total 0
> drwxr-xr-x 1 user1 None 0 Dec  5  2012 .
> d????????? ? ?             ?    ?            ? ..
> drwxr-xr-x 1 user1 None 0 Dec  5  2012 admin drwxr-xr-x 1 user1 None 0 Nov 18 17:50 global
> drwxr-xr-x 1 user1 None 0 Dec  5  2012 man drwxr-xr-x 1 user1 None 0 Dec  5  2012 WTI
>
> ls -al /cygdrive/b
> total 0
> drwxrwxrwx 1 ????????      ???????? 0 Dec  5  2012 .
> dr-xr-xr-x 1 user1 None     0 Nov 18 18:06 ..
> drwxr-x--- 1 ????????      ???????? 0 Dec  5  2012 admin
> drwxrwxrwx 1 ????????      ???????? 0 Nov 18 17:50 global
> drwxr-x--- 1 ????????      ???????? 0 Dec  5  2012 man
> drwxr-x--- 1 ????????      ???????? 0 Dec  5  2012 WTI

And now you see the expected results.

> What is really strange is that the access via b:/ yields different
> access  rights than /cygdrive/b

Explained above.

> I would be really helpful to find a way to use this drive as
> /cygdrive/b/  with the same access rights as for b:/

Supporting DOS-style paths is not a goal of the Cygwin project.  Where they
work as expected, we happily let them be used.  Where they do not, we
recommend using the supported POSIX paths.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple