X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=EzazXsBx1btWIK91G9rxnEXiGLK4EW7H0RX4JF2Ygot83tte60LPb xEoHltnfd1LFmIj3TdHisR1hrLuTf1ZF1gzk0KzexLxTOQroS93SPD89VT7FSOXi XtZ6fidqZRYEPNf32Vin8JTY4lCQFrjayvY5GUlvsevm77OWsvQgMU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=q4K9YJgIvdU3TSiXZMs1Qz9xV4E=; b=ZCfGoQKygM92xHtpw28Bxa9G5u/r wKk4Psbpn2bWWaT1GtjQ8Gy6g6bprH1ScVXWr+XMbVLVzPYhRy/DrHqdmSXTsIB7 ylh9YZNV6lPnv7o6skek04TyRRa2kf25P6E7jgv97WwVcaen5wZrnnSPJuCOMbu2 0h1CSbinKoGS7yE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX181leM6Ni3k89ig3kQMAb6t Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:01:45 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: C++11 program link failure under GCC 4.8.2-1 Message-ID: <20131113140144.GA7865@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <52815780 DOT 2010006 AT gmail DOT com> <528159F8 DOT 2070307 AT gmail DOT com> <5281F8D4 DOT 4090809 AT gmail DOT com> <5282ABED DOT 7040400 AT gmail DOT com> <5282BBCF DOT 9040703 AT cs DOT utoronto DOT ca> <20131113091502 DOT GP427 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131113091502.GP427@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Nov 12 18:37, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> On 12/11/2013 5:30 PM, JonY wrote: >> >Right now, it is guarded by: >> >#if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) >> > >> >Which means non-strict mode and C99 mode, snprintf was not part of >> >C++03. I guess (__cplusplus >= 201103L) needs to be added to newlib. >> Yes, this has come up before [1]. Several *printf variants are >> affected IIRC. >> >> [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00140.html > >I wouldn't mind to see patch submissions fixing stuff like that on the >newlib mailing list. Not at all. What an odd notion. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple