X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
	:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=qaVE8dLG8NqSryUJYumd2IgQ+rJ3
	JLMP9gHlWQ5tjJ4M/gZGDyFg2eeIvIjmosxmqljy+Wj1KDSqCp73utHdYzMb50iY
	qf/xQgldGkW7vsQi/N2h1oN2/FwWlhRo1qg6+42dVMo1HmopiGME/gx3LhFmRZDN
	CiPEJ9x8u3UyNOQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
	:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id
	:references:to; s=default; bh=DFqrmvNUpmDozxJ7QTsREMAY63w=; b=q0
	HcmQC8/vnwoLS1fSMcz/McmM7VJeorriteh5urGfZGUK6XNxQ61Jw5gy1llyIBiv
	/ylmIml4YX1PIVyo2x9O1dAVcu4juYnyXAJR5Ti1mhlKHST2lStyqtFoP1+5tcSB
	saAAbtB6OocCy/OrRfeolOzvVHtjm7HxravCBGVzs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp3-g21.free.fr
Subject: Re: How about a 64-bit installer that doesn't require UAC?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Denis Excoffier <cygwin AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <527CEEBB.5020603@shaddybaddah.name>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 19:34:15 +0100
Cc: Shaddy Baddah <lithium-cygwin AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
Message-Id: <35886A53-5CEC-4633-9388-A677BA9C6B7C@Denis-Excoffier.org>
References: <527563E7 DOT 70508 AT brazier DOT com> <832145579 DOT 20131103022843 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <5276A05B DOT 8010504 AT brazier DOT com> <20131104115343 DOT GC2731 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <527CEEBB DOT 5020603 AT shaddybaddah DOT name>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mailing List" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id rA8IqhQp008614

On 2013-11-08 15:01, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> In my view, this option should only be used by users who understand well
> enough general Windows file permissions, user privileges, etc...
> the general security model, and how Cygwin functions accordingly.
Well, i would say the reverse (i.e. elevation is for knowledgeable people),
but never mind.

More importantly, the new —no-admin/-B option is especially beneficial for users
that are not allowed to elevate or that do not know any Administrator password.

Denis Excoffier.


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple