X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nhJmfFacu9EyPFcHFNxdtJznmSQ48/xIXk/s7Gl+HLp w9dFRpt/HUdZt5ktfawXPs6yQp3efM85ZirM1snLRyGqQI9gQ+hyWOx8VP6tVccD C9DYThvKhWz6ArXVn5HItORNk6varfKvgbdHhBRSJuTLNkQEUvjJgP2Egp5LQ2Hg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=+SwV9WOwgFEm7WMCM7ZlDGAJwms=; b=dDRq5H8Of7LxZH824 VCpg05Nunbuj2ghUgPnN3Eztx71AJOPHQ0vXQWUqB3pYjiX3GJtiPRXMRYRxPr90 ZPowE912o7rUx/sExcsNi64LOFht6LPJEs0Vw630KyPe4JI6+gXfzGoxgXJ+OK7V Ot7ZyzxP0W1fzeuiXAO9+QYjpw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f41.google.com X-Received: by 10.68.253.129 with SMTP id aa1mr261329pbd.189.1383617917363; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:18:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5278557C.2090205@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:18:36 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails References: <52749A63 DOT 70803 AT acm DOT org> <20131102093635 DOT GB25012 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5275D706 DOT 5030207 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20131104114204 DOT GB2731 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5277B2F3 DOT 1060705 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <5277B2F3.1060705@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote: > My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir > aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd > and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate. 'Course, my > to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users > with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup > doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism). > > The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and > sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin. > > If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what? > > Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers? Use $libexecdir but > "know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately? I'm > confused as to how to proceed here. Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with --libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple