X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=LZ HYb7XxphwkUc+/q2seTncP58rS0P7h8W/QAuZeljx+HAGd/5NWlUF7pUKqeagHpl 05t17TA4ouGGuTdB1wtZP6+YCxQQWARMAcAj9Xh6vkArsqSd8CB+uq/WTgU6BygV CRfs3Pj2qWyzkZee7I0zXcFVHUG3Rd2QonMA12n9M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=zeMscfvg tEUb6Gv1KVeoCtaQwv0=; b=RiJ6+TsYBWjnxK++SutFosx3Emu4ZZCuxQsHWNg2 SBu+rpZQ1ThafQrhbnpxD7kIvUDNt+Wq8GNgZjQhRekxrgBH1IQLUnbCV0JUEBKh OGmmIkcg2y826Id90EXTLQB1N32PDMnBt83ZpxiWHEPfsAAEMLC61V6HTxKkSqOc xRY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,FREEMAIL_FROM,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f173.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.120.6 with SMTP id ky6mr13609784igb.58.1383608684301; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:44:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2310234468.20131105023748@mtu-net.ru> References: <2310234468 DOT 20131105023748 AT mtu-net DOT ru> Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:44:44 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Executing Windows commands from Cygwin with or without cmd: what are the pros and cons? From: Kenneth Wolcott To: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Kenneth Wolcott! > >> Where can I find information regarding the pros and cons of using or >> not using the cmd command to execute Windows commands from Cygwin? > > If you clarify, what exactly you are trying to achieve, it would be immensely > easier to answer your question, and the answer will be much more useful. > > That aside, I see a very short list of commands that have no equivalents in > Cygwin environment, and very few of them are actually sensible. > > Soo... which of the.. what? two commands? you plan to use? > > My list is as follows: > > 1. Internal commands affecting the system, but have no counterpart in Cygwin: > ASSOC > ERASE > FTYPE > VERIFY > VOL (?) > > 2. Internal commands with no meaning outside interpreter, or even restricted > to use in batch files, which may or may not have equivalents in Cygwin: > BREAK > CALL > CLS > CMD > COLOR > DIR > ECHO > ENDLOCAL > EXIT > FOR > GOTO > HELP > IF > PAUSE > PROMPT > REM > SETLOCAL > SHIFT > TITLE > VER > > 3. Internal commands, that have appropriate counterparts in Cygwin: > CD > CHDIR > COPY > DATE > DEL > DOSKEY > MD > MKDIR > MOVE > PATH > POPD > PUSHD > RD > REN > RENAME > REPLACE > RMDIR > SET > START (y/n) > TIME > TYPE > > External utilities disguised as internal commands, which may or may not have > counterparts in Cygwin: > AT > ATTRIB > CACLS > CHCP > CHKDSK > CHKNTFS > COMP > COMPACT > CONVERT > DISKCOMP > DISKCOPY > FC > FIND > FINDSTR > FORMAT > GRAFTABL > LABEL > MORE > PRINT > RECOVER > SORT > SUBST > TREE > XCOPY Hi Audrey; I was going to execute a MS-VC++ compiler command, not a DOS/Windows command. I want to do as much as I could for capturing the stdout/stderr output and for capturing the exit status like I would as if I were on a Linux system, or the best that I can under these circumstances. Thanks, Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple