X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=pA1rLA+XhwGSVWiPMMT/7cL8qMRsjlBdrVBBYGXCto3m6ha/SBRb3
	gniGBMWSdPQ2gPMOkjqNzc/aByzXND6HDDh5+aBbdTyr0QWIZu+PhqwoI+roFRf0
	3jD3q1yrfRFSetW70rKhhfGJ7YSR6K/YpKI3m1A6yvpe6vqzBRA+EE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=f5TLGFK21JxQBfiGha4C7y4uct8=; b=TW09xzN+IhdRnqNJrI405o9YPh+T
	zFlDxgG2jj1GD1fX8pAu2X7QmlL4ZA1jaPODWBpo8s08CfnkwtjxX7PRFZvBuJDv
	pMCFDY0ukdJW8zXXoy2R1aHd42U+wyHe84W8VQgPDoGk+hR70vc5fwZmw0PMoQZV
	JwxuTSBL2Ystcwk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+5da3T1fNWMUVh4uHY98o4
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:59:30 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: How about a 64-bit installer that doesn't require UAC?
Message-ID: <20131104155930.GA5526@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <527563E7 DOT 70508 AT brazier DOT com> <832145579 DOT 20131103022843 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <5276A05B DOT 8010504 AT brazier DOT com> <20131104115343 DOT GC2731 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131104115343.GC2731@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Nov  3 14:13, Bill Welch wrote:
>> My apologies for the snark. The list archive ends at the same
>> message as the top of the second page of the nabble rendering and I
>> didn't immediately see the additional messages in nabble that
>> include a workaround.
>
>Setup should work for admins in the first place, without having to
>remember explicit elevating every time.  To fix this for the 64 bit
>version, the best solution is not just to remove the "require admin"
>manifest.  Instead, there's a patch in the loop which allows setup to
>elevate itself.  It's just not ready for prime time yet.

So, probably the Thursday after next, cat-dependent?

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple