DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=lEqWsJk+4ek9bA6MvG0eAF530AJ193FXRL+EJMZMVK9jYNtJQAYDh
	rUcgwZLXQQq5V23jlB1sDmuvraVp+UQENhaMfqfPa7yFNN4uzI/aftIOGsCBbCWv
	KA4p+l7Vvxw+Jl3vQ3yGJeCO7pSMgEHyyz36Q9qWOVRl83IsM5nYcA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:41:14 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Problem with multiprocessing module from Python
Message-ID: <20131031184114.GD6599@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAHhGz88t8H_xQ6h-a6-aQrMf+wTOVT6gMnx42tMpjs=3=qGVTQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <l4ei86$cos$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <l4p2uq$ps8$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <l4p6h3$801$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20131029205935 DOT GC392 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <l4p8oi$24u$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <l4p8vj$24u$3 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20131030093313 DOT GA28558 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <l4u7er$2vj$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <l4u7er$2vj$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:27:39PM +0000, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>Le Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:33:13 +0100, Corinna Vinschen a ??crit??:
>
>> On Oct 29 21:22, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>> Le Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:19:14 +0000, Jean-Pierre Flori a ??crit??:
>>> 
>>> > Le Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:59:35 -0400, Christopher Faylor a ??crit??:
>>> >> If you want this fixed, the easiest way to get that to happen is to
>>> >> post a simple test case which reproduces the problem.  That is not
>>> >> the code snippet that you sent.  A real working example would be
>>> >> required.
>>> > Sorry about that.
>>> > 
>>> > Here you go:
>>> > """
>>> > from multiprocessing import Pool
>>> > 
>>> > def f(x): return x
>>> > 
>>> > p = pool(2)
>>> > 
>>> > p.map(f, [1, 2])
>>> > """
>>> And I managed to introduce a typo. The third line should read Pool, so
>>> it is:
>>> """
>>> from multiprocessing import Pool
>>> 
>>> def f(x): return x
>>> 
>>> p = Pool(2)
>>> 
>>> p.map(f, [1, 2])
>>> """
>> 
>> Works for me.  I guess.  At least, if I run the script, nothing happens:
>> 
>>   $ python x.py $
>> 
>> Same on 32 and 64 bit Cygwin.
>> 
>> 
>> Corinna
>
>I think I got to the bottom of this.
>It seems the new implem of sem_getvalue in cgwin1.dll is the cause, see:
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2013-q3/msg00006.html
>It may also explain the random reproducibility if sval stays uninitialized 
>or something like that (I did not check it is the case though).

I doubt that was the problem.  More likely it is something related to
the changes in thread.cc that followed that change.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple