X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id :resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Ey4A mhT05jhznOCkiG3jh+Su4asBo1rEpvuclDj+C3/f/2jXLcBTGehC4cxHCPZhe8iJ RkxUULsI7KOdQM6yXmlLJMf+msaRPWSugwZfGUF7i85usndYPwkEvGnSIXXx3HLO JaxHVz6wqniVw+oxjOEZBnaAHOH6lcjmzlejlz0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id :resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=UMplC8C4/k 24C7SGYBTqB/1fKxk=; b=EfE2fo0gBNssvRtQPjQ78hy3JSh3300/J0rnxXtSzb dZqeGAU1UAjpjMAvktjKpv68VVCWKHthDfKfC0UWro52+pv4otTE1j/dNMDRu52R pELDxDm2Vmd9zcAjvFChUtCJIXloYyRD2U6ArfmWrzcjVu4gyzuwSt/h5HNydbDh 0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-97.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18Puaq7RdYhESAJQwKg7DXO Resent-From: Christopher Faylor Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:53 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20131010203053 DOT GA2792 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Resent-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Update on Missing 64 bit packages... Message-ID: <20131010203001.GA2559@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <21079 DOT 3281 DOT 546503 DOT 207406 AT consult DOT pretender> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21079.3281.546503.207406@consult.pretender> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:23:45PM -0400, cygwin AT kosowsky.org wrote: >Would it be possible to post an update of (still) missing 64 bit packages? > >The last I saw was from 2 months ago and certainly great progress has >been made in winnowing down the list. Perhaps reposting would help >stimulate some focus on those that have yet to be ported. > >Some of the missing packages are pretty basic *nix stuff like 'procps' >(includes among other things 'top' and pgrep/pkill). In particular, >pgrep/pkill are fundamental building blocks to many scripts... You can see what's available at http://cygwin.com/packages/ A list of missing packages is periodically posted to the apps list. The maintainers know that they have to eventually release packages. Sending something here isn't likely to spur them to work harder. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple