X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id
	:resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Ey4A
	mhT05jhznOCkiG3jh+Su4asBo1rEpvuclDj+C3/f/2jXLcBTGehC4cxHCPZhe8iJ
	RkxUULsI7KOdQM6yXmlLJMf+msaRPWSugwZfGUF7i85usndYPwkEvGnSIXXx3HLO
	JaxHVz6wqniVw+oxjOEZBnaAHOH6lcjmzlejlz0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:resent-from:resent-date:resent-message-id
	:resent-to:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=UMplC8C4/k
	24C7SGYBTqB/1fKxk=; b=EfE2fo0gBNssvRtQPjQ78hy3JSh3300/J0rnxXtSzb
	dZqeGAU1UAjpjMAvktjKpv68VVCWKHthDfKfC0UWro52+pv4otTE1j/dNMDRu52R
	pELDxDm2Vmd9zcAjvFChUtCJIXloYyRD2U6ArfmWrzcjVu4gyzuwSt/h5HNydbDh
	0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-97.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18Puaq7RdYhESAJQwKg7DXO
Resent-From: Christopher Faylor <me AT cgf DOT cx>
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:53 -0400
Resent-Message-ID: <20131010203053 DOT GA2792 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Resent-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:30:01 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Update on Missing 64 bit packages...
Message-ID: <20131010203001.GA2559@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <21079 DOT 3281 DOT 546503 DOT 207406 AT consult DOT pretender>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21079.3281.546503.207406@consult.pretender>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 04:23:45PM -0400, cygwin AT kosowsky.org wrote:
>Would it be possible to post an update of (still) missing 64 bit packages?
>
>The last I saw was from 2 months ago and certainly great progress has
>been made in winnowing down the list. Perhaps reposting would help
>stimulate some focus on those that have yet to be ported.
>
>Some of the missing packages are pretty basic *nix stuff like 'procps'
>(includes among other things 'top' and pgrep/pkill). In particular,
>pgrep/pkill are fundamental building blocks to many scripts...

You can see what's available at http://cygwin.com/packages/

A list of missing packages is periodically posted to the apps list.  The
maintainers know that they have to eventually release packages.  Sending
something here isn't likely to spur them to work harder.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple