X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=u864z0VhZNAVu6TBaWQs+xp+ucJlPFY1d1a+IMJVfcE Tmk3V8IJOQvvfIztlr6kzM1wBui/XyAjkDA8H9H5Lu+SB4Rgj5gRhL5g4ZcN5L7E fIFIrjpHTTWaRjJUIJ1gy46kVuEH6oy9h8Jrj6/gRZLF9BIlHExEoVg6xRdVwQfY = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qwWzdWsrR+tNgDb6o++Cwxw+4z8=; b=c5gbeUCqwXTXRErk5 f8ZxmyTkElTGDnt+JWW5Xx/9swcHVldTs4AwLoBCPAxFXDH11pPSThAGKQKq2JPb 7ICdt4CkmHQAmydfusqxTWHFM8HTgGegC2D2M6iojuFqHbcG+Pah1G/c2++hKJoc FPfBNpK7IlkNAXbGgyiNuiQPIo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: bureau85.ns.utoronto.ca Message-ID: <52556162.2080802@cs.utoronto.ca> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 10:00:02 -0400 From: Ryan Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: checking in >= 256k file fatally corrupts rcs file References: <20131008102204 DOT GB9241 AT plunk DOT org> <525499E5 DOT 4090608 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131009003055 DOT GA30082 AT plunk DOT org> <5254B1C0 DOT 9020004 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20131009070534 DOT GA8855 AT plunk DOT org> <52555C16 DOT 5090505 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: <52555C16.5090505@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 09/10/2013 9:37 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On 10/9/2013 01:05, Don Hatch wrote: >> Would it be possible to simply declare 5.8 DOA > > The Cygwin package system allows one to mark 5.8-1 as obsolete, but I > don't know if it can be told "and downgrade to 5.7-11". > >> If not, can we make a 5.9 that's identical to 5.7, > > If a new Cygwin package had to come out based on 5.7, it would be > called 5.7-12, not 5.9. GNU rcs 5.9 already exists. (The current > upstream release is 5.9.1.) Cygwin packages generally leave the > upstream revision numbers unmolested. Or, just roll a 5.8-2 that happens to be compiled from 5.7 sources, or from 5.8 sources with the optimization disabled. I suspect it would be trivial to disable the optimization in the 5.8 code base. The old behavior was almost certainly disk-only, meaning that the bug lies in the transition from using the buffer to using disk. Disable buffer usage completely and the bug goes away. Ryan -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple