X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=rr4O/o3uwsGKk54m0C4kE76uj9R64 EQw1jw484X+u+TqWPp3HP6KMnrtQBd8TOGynjmhJSJ2Z/ZJrjbkSARJdOtkb9msM TIvtjdOkENFJdxkFOMEGf/Yc9yk3Vx4pkoWerSTz1OAtwOK96nn6xehAl9VIHPtE 2qBcEY8rIJWBaw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; s=default; bh=DiaSUMlgYbQcPLfYzKG4LFOz2o8=; b=KE8 OHtSl6S1b4AK2VaiEr4otLpzB8UHKzgEbEW8zcbAPPRmUUIeVWLYFqwF0kxUupt5 3L2c6OSzi7hbneDZnSukb/XvakYT4fpZwkCWkxjWBEpzr/RF6rPF/v4fwNywHsox TpC2BsSBisCd3qXBbZ1GBNsUH20S7S05HkhXTC/w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qe0-f47.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.192.6 with SMTP id do6mr12475186qcb.3.1380833719168; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 16:55:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: fixing BLODA-caused fork failures From: Adam Kellas To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My company uses Cygwin and we experience fairly frequent fork failures, believed to be BLODA-related. I say "believed to be" because in this corporate environment, like many, we cannot uninstall the virus scanner even long enough to see what happens without it. The presumed culprit in our case is Microsoft Forefront Endpoint Protection, by the way. So we need Cygwin and we're stuck with Forefront, putting us between a rock and a hard place. It's clear from the documentation and mailing list that the official stance wrt BLODA is "sorry, can't help you" and I understand and accept that. I'm looking for the answer to a related question: are BLODA-caused fork failures a logically unsolvable problem due to the way Windows works or is it just a matter of round tuits? In other words, if we were (hypothetically) able to pay someone to make MS Forefront and Cygwin play nicely together, would that have a chance of success? And would the Cygwin maintainers allow such work into the code base or consider it an unfortunate precedent? Thanks, AK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple