X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=UPjvEl4NxxGdeUB306f1ulxmu8VLLoo4BkiQGtZNax3GvoRFzyE9R khqBxIukum5lrPofOkmx964mELBiw1to2t5Tx4OlnzIvV66HMO15mDeqhK67jWzr 7tP/KEtD2/E+BFTJTPu3IGcZQpHUjUk0gU8TBIaSA+rYjnK+t1lH2Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=NqzrJxpbOK2cu6ze718LL8VuUa4=; b=dWaFXngYqI9h9nTmBvFiRmGkVuvt f9ffMtnv5XyyBGmcjltOrCfV8vKmtbfmRMpCAY4NHIzR9AOHxkHI8ZQ62qxcxB4D Gg+3HR5GNEKWXFXSFkNw3nexGrp0wGN9OUklbTZK18OshpUEahCIE1kSGLAGtiUx R695dd/h840k/uY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_LOCALHOST,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/DduZGMgqk7ihdg1KPyfuT Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:05:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cannot run setup64.exe without admin privileges (even if renamed foo.exe) Message-ID: <20130925170543.GA6705@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20130918174034 DOT GB2351 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5239EC4C DOT 7060904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <5242F7FC DOT 8020003 AT cygwin DOT com> <5243064C DOT 50004 AT cygwin DOT com> <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA217707C AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA217707C@MLBXV06.nih.gov> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:59:57PM +0000, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >Does setup for 64 bit cygwin need to be 64 bit? Might all this >be avoided if setup-x86_64.exe were itself 32 bit application? I lost that argument. Apparently some 64-bit systems can't run 32-bit applications. I wanted to just have one setup with a check box determining which version to install. That idea was vehemently rejected. However, this should work (I haven't tried lately): .\setup-x86 --arch=x86_64 Assuming you aren't part of the .001% who can't run x86 executables. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple