X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=FlvmPdxg9IpbjCfEdGr GjzqtCiwHVgwmhK7kz2hMQ0cunYMBogkyehHE+3MfH8bLtqVdY4JfebgfaU6nTUr zRurT5DWZvmMxu2otwt3uXwjOk6mVP27ZJk7lg3l/7hbw1avIkoX+DYELXTRA5gF G+vOQfdkARZJ+oemZc2CKUJM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject :references:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=vCWbsrSPMsELku65xAUOI6JnF 74=; b=Amr0ljZ26cnz0LPvEWMXAy09v3tzM2lcqcijh6mqwTibe7njXADjosoL0 CaF1dyPU2w7+/llTVK8KgAdryYP2oMTtJg/ebELEDsXeEgpJPggST4h7pnnqExfA nBo0tA6cB0MS/z4x07rTRuc/3MJl+zFm8p7meYreIQMIIc4mtI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173001pub.verizon.net MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-id: <52405391.7060909@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:43:29 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: What is the name of the pdftk package (setup-x86_64) References: In-reply-to: On 9/23/2013 10:26 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote: >>> I cannot find pdftk in setup on x86_64. >> Not yet available for 64 bits > > Oh, I see. Is it then recommended to install cygwin 32bits on a 64bits > windows? Is cygwin 64 bits still considered 'experimental'? See any of the recent Cygwin package announcements for that answer. For instance: Also, finding the package containing a program can be answered by searching the Cygwin packages for that program. That search can be performed here: Or just fire up "setup*.exe" and search once you get to the package screen. Of course, using "setup*.exe" to do the searching, while arguably more convenient, means that you're restricted to searching a single architecture. The web page gives you search access to both. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple