X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Nh KpzyEfS6+24uAxTwQUcPIvca8W6UwFD78FhpElJWj86V1SRI5lhQSwyXiqrFXnnV YuAsv1PcYWo/8ETEP/07lwPfzbpW4SvzQa6SSwKATiUYMZbYjKQ1pzelSaDtyqYe KoNKkd3jbckRDlwMKeo106i9BHE2VmpX3RMoq8tl8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=EOl8Q+3I OmnGxXP1qBzbKjsaqKs=; b=aA1CQtGKKSp7WvED311d+myEv3py0xWjVE9hAQlC 10z5nCq4oCVjZ/tccFM/ANM3jlPakHrHLD1b0bRCdyM8jAhBxMm46oVGv/5thEGQ zq5bS4fAW/wFifvtGgNRU/MJdEzMyhUFWMirJRrsLDqz+Wlx8MV5SlVCUbc009bD ajg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ve0-f180.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.98.131 with SMTP id ei3mr23566420vdb.4.1379353655444; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:47:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5237373E.1070905@cygwin.com> References: <5237373E DOT 1070905 AT cygwin DOT com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:47:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Way to test cyglsa? From: Evan Rowley To: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Thanks for the recommendaitons Larry. If $USER is the test, then it appears cyglsa is working on this machine. The firewall is disabled. Thanks for refering me to the BLODA. I noticed some Symantec products listed there. Symantec's Endpoint Protection and Symantec's Bakcup Exec are installed on this server. I doubt those are causes because the same programs are installed on another server where sshd works. In fact, that other server is a copy of this server in question AKA the one which isn't working. The copy was made a few years ago so there are minor differences between the two machines. During my testing I've used the same sshd configurations on both and I can't for the life of me figure out why one works while the other doesn't. For a while, I thought there was an issue with user switching but event log shows success for cyg_server and even for the users I attempt to login with via ssh. Still, sshd appears to close after ssh sends a publickey packet. These servers sit on a domain with a 'strong password' requirement. I'm wondering if there are special keyboard characters in the passwords which may interfere with the way cygwin handles user authentication. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple