X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=h7WkA+noVXF0DiFDOko+wsG2n0i0PwEPV7b2B/f7iJq LMmEedp9F0mMItTaB9J4Ws7OXNlBSAvRZtDuRkxM6p4PEmnIbIZO+kCzObNvVDxm cI04ANH3+RN2xNyAU9Jf5GwPygAoLWWAOPpeTZ/TuqMF/1D20dFJgJw+lr+5nQEY = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=/XLKdOZ98ULldXpM2e+sywzWl6Y=; b=ZZ/h38f/Igg6/KBtc O7zvv5LWDCIio6XM5n1+RHSZGjoGpOM1jRofzdkyfhoA0q1PnJGfLRjFRDsICHfB My1dTagN1B3XGWmcOI1bpGHr3NHKJ2/MPkguB1zIFVZGvSGpyG5xILx+r9kFiH6T Y2M2KF9jzMgqbd5MJ578x1BJtc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: Ishtar.tlinx.org Message-ID: <5225664F.1090104@tlinx.org> Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 21:32:15 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: compress / ncompress package for Cygwin References: <52176D9A DOT 3000602 AT inria DOT fr> <52177A3F DOT 4020504 AT inria DOT fr> In-Reply-To: <52177A3F.4020504@inria.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hubert Garavel wrote: > For porting legacy software to Cygwin, the absence of compress is just > annoying. ==== Why? If gzip can uncompress it, you should switch to gzip or xz anyway, because computers that you release software to are less likely to have compress because 1) it was encumbered 2) it's a POS -- not as good compression in time or space as even gzip if I remember, I know that even bzip2 beat it in compression (space)... xz/7z which are even better for space/uncompress speed weren't even out when I tried it. I found old sources for compress and ported it to work on my system -- and after comparing it to the other compress algorithms, I was sadly unimpressed and later deleted the binaries off my system so I wouldn't forget how bad it was and accidently use them. The patent was the nail in a bad coffin. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple