X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Hactc9vbpT4TgSzwjZxlNjVbnevzszAQcTwumGO7Vw8 xeo21i2CVy/Gq19p7VF4VuV4Uci4dtCSmzOTmXNFxM2UR07+g+bB4L0IJlrp36mg uVo/klshoBWqqvJZUa7dp0Z0HlkTkrrCeUoq6mEDitdhWeiS5osazpG6hiDqbjZk = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=BBNE4lTi+1CXVorJqyqZMFpa+IE=; b=EVUi7e6DNo15sFef2 e4NMgYUG6efzJlOiHr4Csuc7W2QCD5E4KFTsjDf4xn08hGtGjYnU8XsezVyEH5bp 3hTTYPJGdJ4oEOrkFF9T+OVbJkTZ4n8T0FWI2wV6ZRNu+NX+pYJ860IiXKby8+69 3KAL7swdyQ/U1dR6g72yFCDxh8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailgw1.uni-kl.de Message-ID: <5220AEEC.2090900@mathematik.uni-kl.de> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:40:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Steenpa=DF?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: previously reported test case does not work in Cygwin 1.7.18 References: <51790015 DOT 1090304 AT mathematik DOT uni-kl DOT de> In-Reply-To: <51790015.1090304@mathematik.uni-kl.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I would like to bring the issue described below up again. I have just tested this with Cygwin 1.7.24, and it shows the same behaviour as before, so it seems that this bug still persists. My system is: $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 zoppo 1.7.24(0.269/5/3) 2013-08-15 11:55 i686 Cygwin Best regards, Andreas Le 25/04/2013 12:06, Andreas Steenpaß a écrit : > I have tried to run the following test case with the newest release: > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-12/msg00076.html > > It used to work after it was fixed, but now it seems to be broken again. > Actually, it is even worse than before because now, not even thread 1 > catches SIGUSR2: > > $ uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 zoppo 1.7.18(0.263/5/3) 2013-04-19 10:39 i686 Cygwin > $ ./testcase1 > pid: 3628 > thread 1 waiting for SIGUSR1 > > // from another console, send SIGUSR2, then SIGUSR1 (in this order!) > $ kill -SIGUSR2 3628 > $ kill -SIGUSR1 3628 > > // The program catches only SIGUSR1, but not SIGUSR2: > thread 1 received SIGUSR1 > thread 1 waiting for SIGUSR2 > > Best regards, > Andreas > > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple