X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=L+3W5/FF0bmKadUH f6aqqSEXTl6yt1gKxLqVSVEUGt7Xv4LR4Na4Dkf5eAgNHdAi5zlrE13t1lCZJbMj frVVPMNZRk1jhW6irjxpluos9NyI8slKAYbYGfJBDSsr+tY2yzpSnMD1T+1JaaLE aE+7jMCog8ywKJtVlGei9vSi/88= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=oHggXYmU0jmosnWmhen01i hkXhs=; b=QsX4flFbyet2Ky5zTBJ1Ynw5SqBySlPuhC91tovgEk+LmlLyIYZ2f3 f+L/3qcT/GFlQDBrBW6Gomzod/7G2P40LJdgGXwAf421VP1GSxUkDCLtDdvUZSxZ iS2mzzYs4Rnru92/PK5ZvioTXWtqhl0nMTX45lRk1zjzyvEP1J+OM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173003pub.verizon.net Message-id: <521B8A69.7020300@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:03:37 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Install problem with latest cygwin References: <521B79CC DOT 7040501 AT cygwin DOT com> <521B864B DOT 4070101 AT cornell DOT edu> In-reply-to: <521B864B.4070101@cornell.edu> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 8/26/2013 12:46 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 8/26/2013 11:52 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >> On 8/26/2013 5:05 AM, Allan Chandler wrote: >>> >>> I've been running CygWin on my Win7-64 laptop for some time and I >>> recently >>> decided to update to the latest packages, mainly because there's a bucket >>> load more stuff in there. >>> >>> I renamed my cygwin directory to get it out of the way and downloaded/ran >>> setup-x86.exe. Selected ALL packages for download with no install and let >>> it run overnight. >>> >>> The following day, I ran setup again and opted to install from the local >>> directory. This went well, right up to the post-install section where >>> I got >>> "Cannot locate cygncursesw-10.dll"-type dialog boxes for each of several >>> dozen packages. I also get it when I try to run bash after exit. >>> >>> I had a look into the \cygwin directory where everything was created and >>> there's no sign of this file (though it appears under my old version of >>> CygWin in /bin). In the local package area where I downloaded everything, >>> it appears to exist in the x86/release/Cygwin64/cygwin64-ncurses tar.bz2 >>> file but nowhere else in the package area is there a file even containing >>> "ncur". So I'm wondering whether the fact that I'm running the x86 >>> installer means I don't get that file. In which case, why are the >>> post-install scripts (and bash) trying to use it? >>> >>> Has anyone else manages to install the latest CygWin on Win7 this way? >>> Can >>> anyone offer some advice on getting it to work? >> >> Using the package search available at cygwin.com, it appears to me that >> there has been a "hiccup" in the upload for this package. Here are the >> results of searching for cygncursesw-10.dll under x86 and x86_64: >> >> x86: >> x86/cygwin64-ncurses/cygwin64-ncurses-5.9-5 >> x86/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-5.7-18 >> >> x86_64: >> x86_64/cygwin32-ncurses/cygwin32-ncurses-5.7-1 >> x86_64/libncursesw10/libncursesw10-5.9-4 >> x86_64/ncurses-debuginfo/ncurses-debuginfo-5.9-4 >> >> Note that the 64-bit version is also listed under the 32-bit >> installation and vice-versa. And this doesn't seem quite right. > > It's for cross-compiling, in case you want to build a 64-bit application > under 32-bit Cygwin (and vice versa). Ah, OK. That makes sense then. So then I guess these cross-compile packages don't need the DLLs, right? -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple