X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Sr6vTA4gUOZtnLXsAIcgEDz/3qAh/MBGMkyFfSfaRLJfxjPx9P3iZ
	L0idPa2URzrKTNyRzOKx37C5kdLJIkc7myMWFV8phTWYFIz3pHaljx3WccQy4PWL
	CC+c9sVyeQhWv/8ckuhF/zXt6c9iVyHWCfq1FxqOVZM49HMs2MSbXA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=iZpx8gfpHcoxK2zfIpjblJ14VH0=; b=cb1eCFBj8FpbrCrv7cyUroQxchRF
	C9LeWilpf2VVevK2lv72KbnxFm3nO8X0r7uXiAWD4qMPit+6sATD7sN/aATyFlxj
	fY9jy3uzo+cWCY0nJrFdpPoeTFVkmACt0Gb1ao5e0mHMnwupecfuT+0Yuz9M6n/h
	hxAVsAZq1uLKvRc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:14:43 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: .tar.xz for snapshots?
Message-ID: <20130823181443.GD2562@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <52178DCF DOT 1000001 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130823171546 DOT GA6035 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CA+sc5mmg-9E+1q0CuxAFGfM36OOVtGruGnY8fdZW7MKwAPHJ0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAFWoy7GD-0h3sf49tE3XULXhef4OGmCz_Cu5Hv7da2763JnvaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130823180918 DOT GA1584 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4D0iojmU0rbTyz/6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130823180918.GA1584@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Virus-Found: No

--4D0iojmU0rbTyz/6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 23 14:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:00:58PM -0600, Keith Christian wrote:
> >Perhaps we should test to see whether we want to trade compression for t=
ime.
>=20
> The only time that the end-user has to worry about is download time +
> uncompress time.  I think that the win with xz compression outweighs any
> increase in uncompress time.

Doesn't xz also have a faster uncompression than bzip2?


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--4D0iojmU0rbTyz/6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=zaSa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4D0iojmU0rbTyz/6--