X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=AN
	R2wkmNPgoyiYMDdqmjruF1JZ8IpJkAzg+XcpdRwafaTQ55FNFw1WIxRQKY4Vxx8v
	YQygPwy6uWkUT9JdKSfeQuXIzOu0g7ayDPYlc2zvgoFu1yI87Z2PQMOY7m7pVytv
	exlCYKV1Z7peVwF0s8VV2pWOchmRScTJ0ps0NeBtw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=OpeAMV1n
	kh5xdg3Ie4N3EK+zOrw=; b=eVb49kPw7XvZ3gYOfIsqXNyTe8T4K/I8niyJ+SyG
	RzB3X0bEY5IhA0Dit8L84EEVPL4T0vQOpM1K1Gs1rc/UXGPJG1NiU5kSGnEx+mrh
	0dTIlwjcQ4Hh/kc8/zxbNs6RzCHLn7pY7/NuOxb7K9XHOdxXHBORsxFBF+26DopZ
	29Y=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.8.73 with SMTP id p9mr2431362iga.28.1377280858581; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+sc5mmg-9E+1q0CuxAFGfM36OOVtGruGnY8fdZW7MKwAPHJ0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52178DCF DOT 1000001 AT etr-usa DOT com>	<20130823171546 DOT GA6035 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	<CA+sc5mmg-9E+1q0CuxAFGfM36OOVtGruGnY8fdZW7MKwAPHJ0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:00:58 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFWoy7GD-0h3sf49tE3XULXhef4OGmCz_Cu5Hv7da2763JnvaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .tar.xz for snapshots?
From: Keith Christian <keith1christian AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Perhaps we should test to see whether we want to trade compression for time.

Unscientific benchmark:

I compressed a 7.6mb tar file with bzip2, lzip, and xz.  xz had the
best compression but the slowest time, lzip was in the middle in both
speed and size categories, and bzip2 was fastest but less compression.
 gzip was slower than bzip2 and the resulting compressed file was
larger.


Size ratios (xz=1, best compression.)
1.0000 xz   ( 2242856 bytes )
1.0050 lzip
1.1304 bzip2
1.2282 gzip


Time ratios (bzip2=1, fastest compression.)
1.0000 bzip2   ( 0m0.880s )
1.4397 gzip
2.8511 lzip
3.5352 xz


FWIW...........Keith

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Earnie Boyd
<earnie AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:29:03AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>>>Corinna, would you please consider moving to .tar.xz for snapshots?
>>
> -->8--
>> Poll: Does anyone care if we move from bz2 to xz for snapshots?
>>
>
> FYI, MinGW.org uses lzma format for sometime to for the packaging
> archive.  Only Corinna's cat will mind if she ever finds it. :)
>
> --
> Earnie
> -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple