X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=ouK mS/aF5OFd+Cb+HYd9khW5INdWxLMYy6X9J0WlmuIqjC9uesr6aT/+mF+B+ABhaJl XW26S98iW0h7arcJOQHtmLKVuqzwLmwNVKIc2x6QpmAIaz865nX+NFqhv+7vxA5R /05Es1KTsBpKo7QAHp3G+DwT4kTUtvbI8eYHQjPk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=EZgkLvfHC qN7fY6NkqNUHk6kkE0=; b=fWetHhJmEvY4Y8G/aGDL0sCErXZVb7y30JfY3QNCT L+x5Gm/iJZllcWf4aPs0Cby+6AFuslpJJbrOKUdTb6Y5KVT6S/dE5RVC825Kj52k yAD4NcVmPMBWVUbZ0BfnXVmxs6r+rrccNRRz8Yzo6Ed4UUOZC1j5ivoI/LfXBHUu Cw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Message-ID: <52178DCF.1000001@etr-usa.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:29:03 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: .tar.xz for snapshots? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Corinna, would you please consider moving to .tar.xz for snapshots? Two reasons: - tar preserves the executable bit. I suspect this hasn't been a problem in the past since unpacking with, say, the 7-Zip GUI *does* set the executable bit, because of the archive flag hack. But now that I have two Cygwins, I don't need the GUI. I can wget and bzip2 -d a snapshot in one Cygwin and mv it into the other Cygwin's bin, so the difference between .bz2 and .tar.bz2 now matters. - xz because it gives better compression than bzip2 -9 without any extra flags: 1.0 MiB down to 828 kiB. By adding xz's x86 executable BCJ filter -- which has no equivalent in bzip2 -- it gets even smaller: $ tar cf - bin/cygwin1.dll | xz --x86 --lzma2 > $snapshot $ du -h $snapshot 780K $snapshot The tar wrapper doesn't cost anything. It makes no real difference to file size, and GNU tar first learned xz magic in 2009, so you can just 'tar xf' it and expect it to do the right thing. It doesn't hurt the 7-Zip die-hards, either. 7-Zip and xz are part of the same project, so of course the 7ZFM GUI can unpack a .tar.xz. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple