X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=MEW4c8oEs5zl7oNLckVPU1R5LyjvL3UTReeOT9yhMHM UvE57eWSp8LVnLjdvZzoP2kjEE9FdYb2jlPKz76/V3QzHpZSj1eCpAsT6muNcrKp bJwUTsTA3XPxGMhPygj9Xnlomff5yI+cx8JdnxoPR/0xGlvjwKm2RsqMGKADv8ro = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=F34OsIJXZnUm2K/qOip3hx4dIS4=; b=AXZ6X2sBxe0TzMGFC zWEwMxP0LhDFGkAUND5Ksh7chcIHOIOAeuDnFa9RIR1lgkoNkKdWnZtTPiO8xLaO OGlo6X3DlARQ2ckhNTTX+A6gQjEUycwKbwtB5h64Ky1/ZNqT+/h6ILKSIqmHasYl UP2GqdxSaiglrTMMNmTBdt7ALI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Message-ID: <52124A7F.7070401@mailme.ath.cx> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:40:31 +0200 From: bartels User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mt and tar fail on LTO-5 drives References: <520FC274 DOT 3040001 AT mailme DOT ath DOT cx> <20130819101917 DOT GC18757 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <52124601 DOT 5000409 AT mailme DOT ath DOT cx> <5212485D DOT 7050601 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <5212485D.7050601@cs.umass.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/19/2013 06:31 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: > > First of all, it's not clear to me whether it is a Microsoft problem > or a device driver problem. I would see what's known about the behavior > of the devices and their drivers with the specific Windows version you > have. Of course it could be that other tools don't need to ask those > same questions, for some reason, so that they end up working fine .. Good thinking. Running W7 64 professional. It detects the HP drive and automatically installs some driver. This driver shows the same behaviour as the HP driver. And then there is the IBM driver. Not sure if W7 installs a default driver for that. Same story. What does that tell you? - Bartels -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple